|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
| Cruzan
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:03 AM Original message |
| What's with the weird cropping on Obama's 'official presidential portrait' (from Wikipedia)? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| |
tekisui | Jan-21-09 11:04 AM | #1 |
| |
Cruzan | Jan-21-09 11:05 AM | #2 |
| |
tridim | Jan-21-09 11:09 AM | #3 |
| |
Poll_Blind | Jan-21-09 11:09 AM | #4 |
| |
Texas Explorer | Jan-21-09 11:19 AM | #9 |
| |
Radical Activist | Jan-21-09 12:35 PM | #20 |
| |
ComtesseDeSpair | Jan-21-09 11:11 AM | #5 |
| |
apnu | Jan-21-09 11:27 AM | #12 |
| |
Radical Activist | Jan-21-09 12:36 PM | #21 |
| |
GreenPartyVoter | Jan-21-09 12:36 PM | #22 |
| |
supernova | Jan-21-09 11:14 AM | #6 |
| |
AndyA | Jan-21-09 11:17 AM | #7 |
| |
Lex | Jan-21-09 11:18 AM | #8 |
| |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME | Jan-21-09 11:24 AM | #10 |
| |
Posteritatis | Jan-21-09 12:01 PM | #16 |
| |
YOY | Jan-21-09 11:25 AM | #11 |
| |
Freddie Stubbs | Jan-21-09 11:29 AM | #13 |
| |
sparosnare | Jan-21-09 11:29 AM | #14 |
| |
Poiuyt | Jan-21-09 11:37 AM | #15 |
| |
Occam Bandage | Jan-21-09 12:03 PM | #18 |
| |
Occam Bandage | Jan-21-09 12:02 PM | #17 |
| |
Poiuyt | Jan-21-09 12:34 PM | #19 |
| tekisui
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. What weird cropping? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cruzan
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. Got only one shoulder |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tridim
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:09 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. It looks fine to me. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Poll_Blind
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:09 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. It's cause his other arm is Gettin' Shit Done! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Subdivisions
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 9. Bwaahahahahah! Duzy nom.. Oh...wait... n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Radical Activist
|
Wed Jan-21-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 20. lol |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ComtesseDeSpair
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. It's cropped perfectly. The flag balances the image. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| apnu
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:27 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 12. Exacty, the "rule of thirds" is in play here vertically in this picture. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Radical Activist
|
Wed Jan-21-09 12:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 21. also what I thought. That way... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GreenPartyVoter
|
Wed Jan-21-09 12:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 22. Yep. Seems a-ok to me |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| supernova
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. It has to fit in all those gov't issue frames |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AndyA
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. I think it looks good. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lex
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
| 8. The picture is balanced just fine. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OPERATIONMINDCRIME
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
| 10. I Heard They Did It PURPOSELY Just To Piss Really Stupid People Off. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Posteritatis
|
Wed Jan-21-09 12:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 16. Hee (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| YOY
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
| 11. Looks fine to me. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Freddie Stubbs
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
| 13. It is the same as the official portrait: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Avalux
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
| 14. He's leaning left! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Poiuyt
|
Wed Jan-21-09 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
| 15. I don't care for the full frontal view myself |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Occam Bandage
|
Wed Jan-21-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 18. Right. Nobody ever confuses mug shots with glamor shots. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Occam Bandage
|
Wed Jan-21-09 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. Not a professional photographer, I take it? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Poiuyt
|
Wed Jan-21-09 12:34 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 19. Malia probably took it with her little digital camera! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 25th 2013, 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC