Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leahy On Report: Schlozman Lied To Me

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 01:59 PM
Original message
Leahy On Report: Schlozman Lied To Me
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/01/leahy_on_report_schlozman_lied_to_me.php

Leahy On Report: Schlozman Lied To Me
By Zachary Roth - January 13, 2009, 10:44AM


Pat Leahy, the chair of the Senate Judiciary committee, just put out the following statement on the DOJ report into politicized hiring:

Today's report confirms some of our worst fears about the Bush administration's political corruption of the Justice Department. Not only did senior Republican appointees violate the law in hiring based on politics in the Civil Rights Division, they also lied about it when called to explain themselves to Congress.

I am particularly disturbed about the findings that a senior Justice Department appointee, Bradley Schlozmann, made false statements under oath when appearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Lying to Congress undermines the very core of our constitutional principles and blunts the American people's right to open and transparent government. Not only did he lie to me and the Committee, but he then refused to cooperate with Justice Department's internal oversight offices' investigation into illegal hiring practices in the Department's Civil Rights Division. The clear determination that he broke the law corrodes our trust in our system of justice and in the nation's top law enforcement agency. His actions in fact undermine the very mission of the Department's Civil Rights Division, which is charged with enforcing federal law prohibiting discrimination.

A strong and independent Civil Rights Division has long been crucial to the enforcement of our precious civil rights laws, and experienced and committed career attorneys have always been the heart and soul of that Division. Contrary to those traditions, however, this report details troubling revelations of political appointees who marginalize and force out career lawyers because of ideology, and, corrupt the hiring process for career positions. It should come as no surprise that the result, and of course the intent, of this political makeover of the Civil Rights Division has been a dismal civil rights enforcement record.

This report is just one of the final chapters in the regrettable legacy of the Bush administration at Main Justice, and it reinforces the need for new leadership. Now more than ever, it is necessary to confirm a new team to lead the Justice Department, starting with Attorney General designee Eric Holder.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ooooohhh! A strongly worded letter! Terrifying! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. seriously, what do you want him to do? put a gun to the guy's head?
He can't prosecute him. He can't do anything but issue subpoenas and write strongly worded letters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. What Schlozman did is a crime. Leahy does have recourse here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. it's not up to Leahy. he can't prosecute him. That's up to the Justice Department.
What recourse do you think Leahy has?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I was under the impression that Congress did have authority to prosecute
people for lying under oath. I know it's difficult and arcane but possible. And the outrageous and extraordinary lying by Bush Admin officials over and over again to Congress means it's time to air out all the powers of the Congress to regain some oversight control as is their responsibility.

Am I wrong on this?

If it's possible, I believe Leahy and other Congresspeople should perform their duty to ensure this doesn't happen in the future. If Schlozman gets away with such blatent lying, I'm fairly sure that Congress will never again be effective as a method of open government whereby govt officials are held to account for their actions. Everybody would lie then. There wouldn't be any consequences. Why would anyone even care to tell the truth under oath since they could obviously get away with it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Any American can file a Criminal complaint
It is then up to the Authorities to either follow up or drop it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. There will be a new justice department soon
We will see if they bring it back up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. And so?
no prosecution, so what? ends up like everything else in the criminal enterprise

another ho hum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Late Update: Indeed, DOJ did decline to prosecute Scholzman. From the report:

Interestingly, the report is dated July 2, 2008, but was only released today. I'm speculating here, but I suspect that's because the findings were referred to DOJ for possible prosecution of Schlozman. We're trying to nail down now whether that explains the delay in releasing the report - and whether that means DOJ has declined to prosecute Schlozman for lying to Congress.




Late Update: Indeed, DOJ did decline to prosecute Scholzman. From the report:

We referred the findings from our investigation to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia in March 2008. We completed this written report of investigation in July 2008.
The U.S. Attorney's Office informed us on January 9, 2009, of its decision to decline prosecution of Schlozman. The Interim U.S. Attorney, Jeffrey Taylor, was recused from the matter and the decision.

We are now releasing our July 2008 report of investigation.


http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/01/doj_ig_takes_down_schlozman.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. He needs to be disbarred
Our local blogs are buzzing. Even the GOPers are pissed about Schlozman.

Just came out in our paper that the DOJ decided not to charge him with a crime.

In other words, if a president lies about sex, he is impeached. But a US attorney lies under oath and nothing happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. That sounds like a good solution; disbar the bastid. He can go
try to find work elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watrwefitinfor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Damn good thing
Schlozman didn't do this back in the day, when it was illegal to lie to Congress.

Or deny Civil Rights to people.
Or obstruct justice...

Wat

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Lying to Congress is a federal Crime
Book him Dano

If you let him get away with it then your hearings mean nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. didn't you get the memo from Mannthrax Coultercaust?
perjury is a feeble, pissy little offense not worth putting 70 million dollars into prosecuting someone on ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Bradleee Schhhlozzmannnn!!!"
I miss Jim Ward's Jerry Lewis-like take on this guy... B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC