Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Folks, I am really liking the Chu pick.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:27 PM
Original message
Folks, I am really liking the Chu pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who's Chu. Sorry I missed that one. Solis! woohoo!
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Energy Secretary nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I love!!!! the sounds of him!
Thanks for the wiki link. :applause: Chu!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Solis also. Yes. Hi, lonestarnot. Solis is a very good choice.
There's some serious motivational energy in this new Cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I am loving the Chu pick myself
Imagine a Nobel Prize winner in that office. Wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hey. didn't know you were in the neighborhood but the neighborhood
just got even better.

Yes. Chu. I am loving it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. And energy secretary who believes in the pursuit of science
I love it.

And it's always great to drop by the neighborhood, have a cup of tea, get a cookie now and then. Makes you feel like you belong and are among friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. If I knew you were coming, I'd have baked a cake.
Chu brings the white-hot nobility of knowledge into Present Obama's Cabinet meetings and policy decisions.

It has been a long and dreary 8 years of the absence of that under Dubya.

I agree with lonestarnot that Solis is a peach of a pick. And with Chu, there is the distinct chance also of undoing the damage Bush has done to our national life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. And this appointment is not bad either
John P. Holdren, Heinz professor of environmental policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, is to be nominated as the White House science adviser by President-elect Barack Obama, according to several news reports.

http://harvardmagazine.com/breaking-news/professor-holdren-be-nominated-white-house-science-adviser

(Ah, yeah, *that* Heinz. That chair is endowed by the Heinz Foundation.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Ah -- THAT Heinz.
Talk about a stream with snow at its source.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynicalguy1111 Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
38. hes a smart guy according to wiki
didn't know he was that smart tho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's not gay. Therefore Obama is a bigot.
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 10:31 PM by BlooInBloo
http://www.advocate.com/exclusive_detail_ektid68852.asp



EDIT: Corrected the worst misspelling of "therefore" I've ever seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm pretty sure he's a boy.
Not that I've CHECKED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ooopsy - thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. yah, science!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yes. Science, real and actual, and honored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. it's back baby!
:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. Chu and Hilda Solis make me very happy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Hey there. Welcome of the night of the Solstice.
I think that first meeting of Obama's White House Cabinet and staff is going to be a very good one.

I can't attend it but I'd love to have a transcript.

Chu and Solis in particular are just stopping me in my tracks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I read that winter starts at 6:04 am CST tomorrow....I'm ready....
And I would love to be a fly on the wall at that first cabinet meeting....

I always love to read your threads. I need upbeat friends!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. You're one of the good guys, Rowdyboy. You're right on the
beginning of winter, although for some of us it's already kicked in pretty good. I'm in longjohns and snowboots just to get to the grocery store.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. OC, did you see my post about the NOAA lady?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Hi, Blue_In-AK -- thanks for providing the link to your thread --
I missed it and had not heard of Lubchenko, but my god she sounds excellent.

I just posted on your thread and kicked that sucker. The pro-Science tilt to Obama's administration is under-covered in the press. What a pleasure that Science matters after 8 years of being dismissed under Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
23. All Obamaz technical picks have been impeccable. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
24. I had listened to one of his speeches and came away impressed as hell.
Clearly Obama made a good choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Hi, opihimoimoi. Yep. I plugged into some of those interviews and addresses
and came away as impressed as you were.

Chu cuts a wide swath, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. The man is cutting edge on energy....a bit more than Sarah is, LOL
Somehow, I would like to make contact with him...can we do that??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I imagine he has a Stanford office, although I'd have to hunt it down."
Edited on Sun Dec-21-08 01:00 PM by Old Crusoe
"a bit more than Sarah" ! LOL!

I bet his monthly clothing budget is a good deal less, too!

- - -

His department contact info is:

http://www.stanford.edu/dept/physics/contacts.html

Stanford University Physics Department
Main Office, Varian Physics room 108
382 Via Pueblo Mall
Stanford, CA 94305-4060
Receptionist/Information: (650) 723-4344
Fax: (650) 723-1821

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Thank you very much...I will make contact and see what happens
If ya wish, I will share correspondence

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaHa_9d2y5s&feature=related

russel watson nella fantasia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Great. Would love to hear it.
:thumbsup: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. rgr that :o)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
30. I'm really liking him too, my dear Old Crusoe...
K&R

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Hey there California Peggy.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
32. KnR....just thought of something...his bio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Thank you.
I want a wall poster of Steven Chu. And a lunch box. That's where I'm at in the phase of sycophancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. John P Holdren Link to Lecture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
33. This is a good pick by Obama! But still needs choices to limit corporate influence in government...
Edited on Sun Dec-21-08 03:20 PM by calipendence
Chu, though helping us start getting more intelligent policies in energy, etc., still won't directly confront the corporate lobbyists that is so sorely needed in government now.

Obama still needs to stop appointing more DLC choices and at least get some folks in strong positions that will start tearing down the institutionalized bribery system that is so corrupting our government that corporate lobbying represents. DLC folks on his cabinet aren't going to do this.

Chu will help us with more intelligent energy policy. Other choices (and perhaps SCOTUS choices) will perhaps protect women's rights to choose, and work on focusing democratic activism towards other social issues that don't directly threaten the corporate lobby influences.

Though we should cheer choices like Chu by Obama, and pat him on the back for it, we shouldn't allow his selection to distract us from the sore need to completely reform our government from corporate influence, which is why this country's middle class and its very economy is on a precipice now. The sooner they realize that they can't distract us with other issues that they've been doing so much over many years, the sooner they'll realize that in order to get reelected, they will need to deal with this and do something that helps the people vs. the corporate agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynicalguy1111 Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #33
39. which scotus nominee would u elect to protect women's rights?
i always thought hillary clinton would be a good scotus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. The issue is that SCOTUS nominee should BOTH protect women's rights AND lose corporate personhood...
Edited on Mon Dec-22-08 05:54 AM by calipendence
as well as be quizzed on how he/she would use the constitution to govern their decisions (so that we can make sure the laws on torture, posse comatatus, habeus corpus, etc. that this administration has destroyed get restored the way they should be in a constitutional way.

That's what I mean that we should look at the larger picture and not just get lead into focusing on a few emotional issues at the expense of others, no matter how important those emotional issues might be to us, and ones we should still demand to be protected as well.

Someone like Erwin Chemerinsky I think would make an excellent SCOTUS judge, who's VERY well versed in law, and one day I think could make a very good candidate for chief justice if we could ever see Roberts being replaced. Margerie Cohn thinks so too and has said so on a number of shows as well.

We need to stay focused on the big picture.

Steve Chu is a good nominee, and we SHOULD celebrate his nomination, but we still aren't tackling the big problems of wresting congtrol of this government away from those that would work against the will of the people yet. That still needs to be done quickly to really turn this country around. Obama needs to be made to see this through our lobbying efforts.

I think it would also be bad form to nominate Clinton as a judge shortly after giving her Secretary of State. Let her work at that for a while first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
37. I had to research but
I have to agree :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. - - - -
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC