*** Pro-Gay Lowery to deliver benediction at Obama’s Inaugural ***

[Deja Q]

http://gayboomers.net/2008/12/19/pro-gay-lowery-to-deliver-benediction-at-obama%E2%80%99s-inaugural/

Now can everybody finally close the subject?

[charlie]

1. Is this one of those "balance" arguments?

Like the way champagne balances out a shit sandwich?

[mondo joe]

8. Like FOX news - Fair AND Balanced!

Unlike the OP.

[FiveGoodMen]

2. If it opened with a White Supremacist and closed with someone fair-minded

could we close the subject then?

[RandomKoolzip]

3. Yeah, we know. Doesn't change shit.

Instead of "balancing" a hateful misgynist bigot with a nice, tolerant religio-person, why not just not invite the hateful misogynist bigot?

[CreekDog]

4. prepare to be lumped in with bigots

that's what happens around here.

[David Zephyr]

5. No. Where's David Duke to give "balance". Subject not closed. Subject opening wider.

Sorry to disappoint you, but the party is spoiled.

[liberalmuse]

6. Oooo! That makes everything okay!

Not.

[mondo joe]

7. And Colmes to balance Hannity!

Brilliant!

[applegrove]

9. That sounds more like the type of pastor Obama should have at the inarguration. Too bad about the

Warren guy. All I can figure is that Obama must be up to something with that pick.

[leeroysphitz]

10. Some views don't deserve equal time.

Bigotry is near the top of that very short list.

[Believing Is Art]

11. If you don't like the backlash over Warren, don't read it

Out LGBT friends are justifiably angry. They need to vent. No one's forcing you to read any of it.

[Toasterlad]

12. Why Am I Totally NOT Surprised That YOU Think This Solves Everything?

Your outlook on GLBT issues is historically and persistently simplistic at best, Log Cabian at middle.

[jonnyblitz]

13. you think you are the first one to try to shut us up with this weak

bullshit?

[noamnety]

14. WTF.

Does Obama need a special prize for selecting a token non-bigot now?

They should ALL be in favor of human rights, how hard is that to figure out?