Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Caroline Kennedy more or less qualified than Liddy Dole?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:03 PM
Original message
Poll question: Is Caroline Kennedy more or less qualified than Liddy Dole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. While I understand those who oppose her candidacy for
Edited on Mon Dec-15-08 03:06 PM by malaise
the Senate on the grounds of dynasties, she brings a breath of fresh air to Washington. She is no Washington insider

She is more qualified than Liddy Dole, but how hard is that.

add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. "She is more qualified than Liddy Dole, but how hard is that." LOL!
The people who are saying she is a dynasty see her name and shut their minds off soon thereafter.

You're right, she's not a Washington "insider." But, for me that's not a good thing, especially since she's going in halfway through a very important term. Being a Senator is a big deal, doubly so, since it's for New York, a populous state.

Nonetheless, someone is going to have to fill the seat, so why not her? She has the name, which is a benefit as far as contacts go, but her lifetime outside politics may give her the perspective many fear she doesn't have due to her last name.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. How much more inside can you get than being a friend of a sitting president?
Edited on Mon Dec-15-08 03:35 PM by sfexpat2000
:)

If you mean an outsider in the sense of a stranger to K Street, that's a huge plus. Not for sale.

And in her case, her name signifies a tradition of public service, not generations of bilking the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. I think what makes one a Washington insider should be the subject of another thread ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. What "qualifies" one to be a Senator?
Does the job require skills? Don't we just want somebody honest and capable of learning new things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. The teevee keeps telling me Caroline Kennedy is J-Lo.
So, I decided to see what DU might think of her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
64. Must have attained 30 years of age, must have been a US citizen for 9 years, and ...
must be an inhabitant of the state for which chosen when elected. She's qualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Qualified for what?
to be Senator from New York?

Caroline Kennedy

to wipe asses?

Liddy Dole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
56. Liddy's not getting anywhere near my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Running the Red Cross
is a pretty big job, say what you will about the Red Cross itself. I don't know that Caroline has that kind of experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I seriously doubt Liddy "ran" the Red Cross.
I think she was more a figure head than anything.

It wasn't like she was a manager or anything, wasn't she just President? And wasn't there some kind of scandal during her tenure?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. I think she did
She was President & CEO from 1991 - 1999. Like Bernadette Healey and everybody else who has been the head of the Red Cross and took the heat when things didn't go right. The only scandal I remember is the same one there is after every disaster, they didn't distribute all the money to Oklahoma City victims. There may have been others, it was 8 years after all.

Anyway, here's her bio. Will probably surprise you, it did me.

http://www-cgi.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/conventions/san.diego/players/hanfords/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Very impressive, thank you for the link.
She has done quite well for a woman during that part of history.

Maybe she shouldn't have entered politics? It sounds like she did much better in the private sector--lobbying did allow her to meet her husband Bob.

Being Transportation Secretary under Reagan is nothing to brag about, considering all that union busting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. If you're against unions it is
She's got a great resume for a Republican and that was the question. She was more than qualified to run for Senate. She was more qualified to be VP than Sarah Palin was, that's for damn sure. I'm not saying a Dem Governor should appoint Dole over Caroline Kennedy, but Dole does have more relevant experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. There was a big 'tainted blood' scandal while she was there.
Her tenure in charge of it was a trainwreck.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. But wasn't her response in tune with the GOP position on gay people? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. Oh yeah, I remember that
I think she inherited that problem, in fairness. But did a horrible job of fixing it. Do people still donate their own blood before surgeries? I don't know but I know people did then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
51. The Red Cross has its institutional problems, like...
local chapters being VERY independant and the Board being factious-- none of which any Director has been able to deal with properly. The charter makes it difficult to run and makes you wonder why it works at all.

Be that as it may, Liddy Dole's resume is a damn good one, even if she did do a lot of work for the other side and now votes for them. She's never been accused of lax management or poor judgement that I know of and has been scandal-free, even during the criminal cabinets of the Nixon and Reagan days.

And she did it all on her own, without a family dynasty pulling strings.

She's the kind of person we should try to work with, not hate with a kneejerk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. "She's the kind of person we should try to work with"
She was voted out, I'd like to think it was because of this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLkazmjpcIs

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. But, it might have been due to this ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. The Red Cross is one big racket
It is way more political than most people realize and sadly aligned to some very right wing people and groups.
I'd trust Caroline Kennedy 1000 times more than Liddy Dole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. New Orleanians still have tales of the RC selling bread after Hurricane Betsy
That's right, selling bread. :grr: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. I could tell you amazing stories about them after hurricanes and
floods in this part of the hemisphere. Donations sent to help people after a major flood in one Caribbean country were stolen by the politicians and the rest allocated to supporters of his party. Of course his wife was in charge. I don't give them a dime. Their decent days have long been over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. The American Red Cross is a huge racket. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
48. I didn't say anything about trust
The question was about qualifications. There is a huge difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. What do they have in common other than falopian tubes? Why THIS comparison?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I was trying to think of someone who became a Senator based primaily on name recognition. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
33. MANY: Lincoln Chafee, Robert Kennedy, Rep. Jack Kemp, Hillary C, JohnWarner ...
Edited on Mon Dec-15-08 03:56 PM by MookieWilson
Margaret Chase Smith, Ted Kennedy, John Kennedy, Claiborne Pell, almost Eleanor Roosevelt, Bill Bradley, Jim Bunning...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. Okay, and I went with Dole, Thank you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
52. and a whole lot of others who got their start in politics because of their names
Long tradition of it, including Al Gore, Evan Bayh, Russ Carnahan, Mary Landrieu, John Dingell, Doris Matsui (that's just Democrats -- there also are plenty of repubs who have gotten their start by being part of a political family).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
41. A Buckley, a Clinton... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Don't know about more qualified
but I would expect Caroline to be more competent.

:P

Liddy could have chosen to be competent with all the different positions she has held, but she has chosen the fluffball path every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Liddy Dole was better qualified. She had worked in the White House
under Kennedy (I think, possibly Johnson). She started out as a Democrat. I'm unaware that Caroline Kennedy has worked in any government, much less political, jobs. Did she work as an attorney in a law firm? What has she done in her life other than write books?

I have the impression she was a lawyer but didn't practice that much.

I think that originally she studied art history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. "Did she work as an attorney in a law firm?"
According to Wikip*dia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Kennedy#Professional_life) she did a little more than what you've so flippantly posted:

Kennedy is an attorney, editor, writer and member of the New York and Washington, D.C. bar associations. She is one of the founders of the Profiles in Courage Award,

(...)

From 2002 to 2004, Kennedy worked as chief executive for the Office of Strategic Partnerships for the New York City Department of Education. During this time, she helped raise more than $65 million for the city’s public schools.<3> She currently serves as the Vice Chair of The Fund for Public Schools, a public-private partnership founded in 2002 to attract private funding for public schools in New York City. <5>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. She is a fundraiser and social maven. That does not qualify
her for the position of senator.

She is an attorney, but what did she do with her law degree? Did she ever practice law?

I do not think that she is at all qualified to be senator. But then it is up to the people of New York. They should hold a special election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
55. I agree with you, JD. Dole was also Secy of Transportation before she ran for Senate
Caroline Kennedy, as fond as we are of her family, is not as experienced as Liddy Dole. That said, there are inexperienced Senators out there. Caroline Kennedy is not a bad choice for junior senator. Not the best, but not bad. And she might be able to sway a few people because of her family ties. On the other hand, she might not win reelection against a more experienced Dem in a primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
62. Tell me, what do you think about Al Franken's candidacy for the Senate?
Is he better qualified than Caroline Kennedy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. She's working in government right now funding raising for NYC schools
and she interned with Teddy. She's a member of the NY and DC bar.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bout the same really
Liddy Dole had run a large organization before becoming a Senator, whereas Kennedy's work had more been on the fundraising and advocacy side, but of course neither would have all that much of a chance without their name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Qualified for what? Liddy's got it all over Caroline for parts
Edited on Mon Dec-15-08 03:27 PM by Vinca
in movies about elderly aliens. (Aliens as in extraterrestrial beings.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. strictly in terms of resume, Kennedy is less qualified
In every other way, she's more qualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Good distinction. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. I'm no fan of Dole, and I support Caroline Kennedy, but Dole was quite qualified to run for senate
Edited on Mon Dec-15-08 03:56 PM by onenote
Dole served in both the Johnson and Nixon White Houses and was appointed to a seat on the Federal Trade Commission in 1973 -- before she married Bob Dole. She later served in two Cabinet posts -- secretary of transportation (Reagan) and secretayr of labor (bush I).

That being said, from the perspective of a Democrat, the only qualifications that I care about are two that Caroline has: she'll support the Democratic agenda and she's electable.

edited to change treasury to transportation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I thought she was Transportation Sec under Ronald "Screw the airlines" Reagan? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. And?
Just because you don't like someone's politics doesn't mean that they don't have qualifications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Being GOP means not being qualified. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. my bad: my brain said transportation but my hands typed treasury
Damn "T" words.

I've edited my post. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
49. LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. No one is less qualified than..
Caroline Kennedy. The problem is she is a Kennedy, and therefore totally unacceptable. Although, I'm not sure if it's all Kennedy's or just Caroline that is an insult to the good Democrats of DU. I live in MA, so I don't have that problem. I wish she would take over her uncle's seat here..if god forbid it is vacated. I hope New Yorkers are pleased with whoever they get, and I really hope it's not Caroline. All that ugliness. Who needs it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. How is her being a Kennedy "totally unacceptable"?
What do you mean by
All that ugliness.


???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. I've read my eyeful....
of Caroline's being awarded the Senate seat as a 'political plum', and only because she is a Kennedy. Seems that being a lawyer, author, being involved in the New York Public School system, as well as an advocate for many causes and Democratic ideals is not relevant. All the ugliness is what I've already read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Are you saying the ugliness is what other people are saying about Caroline, and not ...
... anything she herself has been involved in?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. Yes. I haven't read one word...
about anything Caroline Kennedy has actually done, by those who are adamantly opposed to her occupying that seat. Either good or bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
30. Observing most senators, the qualification bar is very, very, low.
Although, heaps of money does help most to overcome their lack of qualifications to be other than ordinary crooks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
39. Looking at the qualifications-- it seems about equal...
Having looked at the the qualifications for a New York Senate seat-- it seems about equal...

"...a senator must be 30 years of age, a citizen of the United States for 9 years, and must reside in the state he or she represents at the time of election."




As for the rest of our own, personally-imposed curricula vitae qualifications, I imagine they're all pretty subjective both in scope and nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #39
50. Touche. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
46. More.
Since she was not rejected by voters like Dole just was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
57. Qualified or not, Dole was a backbencher
who never distinguished herself in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. True, so perhaps her "qualifications" didn't necessarily translate to competence? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Or initiative.
Circumstances granted her the opportunity to stand up and be a leader in some of the most trying times her nation (and her state) had seen over the past 40 years.

Yet she didn't rise to the occasion. In a way, it's rather sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. Excellent point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
60. Liddy Dole disqualified herself
Her lying anti-Atheist crap tirade shows that she thinks there should be a State Religion. For rejecting her responsibility to uphold the constitution, she is not qualified to serve (as the voters of North Carolina correctly determined). Just by showing up with her head out in the open air, CK is more qualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
63. I'll take a liberal Senator over a perfume-drunk Far Right Senator any day.
Go, Caroline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
65. What about "Fuck Liddie Dole"? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC