Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush; "I hope they don't choose confrontation". Who was he talking about?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:07 AM
Original message
Bush; "I hope they don't choose confrontation". Who was he talking about?
A. Iraq
B. Iran
C. The US Senate

Answers below:












===============
Trick question. The answer is all three.

Iraq - "Should Saddam Hussein choose confrontation, the American people can know that every measure has been taken to avoid war, and every measure will be taken to win it"

Iran - "Should Mahmoud Ahmadinejad choose confrontation, the American people can know that every measure has been taken to avoid war, and every measure will be taken to win it."

US Senate - "Should the US Senate choose confrontation, the American people can know that every measure has been taken to avoid war, and every measure will be taken to win it."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe he's talking about the House Judiciary Committee
Junior offered to send his boys over to chat informally with Conyers, with no record or oath. Kinda like when he and Lord Vader had their meeting together with the 911 commission. That dog don't hunt no more. The committee just voted to send over subpoenas to force them to appear under oath and on the record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Informal Chat - Break Out The Beer and Pretzels.......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. accusing and threatening the US Senate, could he be held
for contempt of congress??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's the rhetoric of a bully. "Might makes right."
These are people for whom the pursuit of their own interests (i.e. appetites) accommodates no interference.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. The bully's actions are always the victim's fault...
"He chose confrontation by not agreeing I was entitled to his lunch money."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. This from Thinkprogress
According to the Congressional Research Service, under President Clinton, 31 of his top aides testified on 47 different occasions. The aides who testified included some of Clinton’s closest advisors:

Harold Ickes, Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff - 7/28/94

George Stephanopoulos, Senior Adviser to the President for Policy and Strategy - 8/4/94

John Podesta, Assistant to the President and Staff Secretary - 8/5/94

Bruce R. Lindsey, Assistant to the President and Deputy Counsel to the President - 1/16/96

Samuel Berger, Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs - 9/11/97

Beth Nolan, Counsel to the President - 5/4/00

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC