|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
| depakid
|
Mon Dec-08-08 03:58 AM Original message |
| US gun company Constitution Arms says its guns for elderly will be subsidised |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| izzie
|
Mon Dec-08-08 04:21 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. Sounds like a deal for someone to dip into tax payers money |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| salin
|
Mon Dec-08-08 04:32 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. My read: scamming company |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| madrchsod
|
Mon Dec-08-08 04:38 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. here is a better article |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Ganja Ninja
|
Mon Dec-08-08 08:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 11. What a piece of crap! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Historic NY
|
Mon Dec-08-08 06:08 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. What happens when they squeeze it for their medical alert button. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cstanleytech
|
Mon Dec-08-08 06:17 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. Not to mention those with asthma and other breathing problesm who reach for their rescue inhaler |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
|
Mon Dec-08-08 06:31 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. I remember when my mom had dementia. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| peace13
|
Mon Dec-08-08 09:07 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 12. Exactly! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Mon Dec-08-08 09:10 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 13. In before LanternWaste says "Add retirement homes to the places I won't go" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| desktop
|
Mon Dec-08-08 07:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. Normally you would think this is a joke, but not in America, it's all to real |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Mon Dec-08-08 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
| 8. I enjoy reading stories like this just to see peoples' heads exploding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Endangered Specie
|
Mon Dec-08-08 09:19 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 14. *BOOOM* oooh ahhh *POW* ooh aaaaahhh |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NOW tense
|
Mon Dec-08-08 07:24 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. Maybe they can claim it will reduce assisted suicide. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dothemath
|
Mon Dec-08-08 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 10. thanks ................. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Mon Dec-08-08 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 15. How is a gun a "medical device"? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AlbertCat
|
Mon Dec-08-08 09:41 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 16. How is a gun a "medical device"? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| benEzra
|
Mon Dec-08-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 27. That claim appears to be more or less to generate publicity (and it's working). |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Mon Dec-08-08 10:27 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 18. It's not the gun itself |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Mon Dec-08-08 10:42 AM Response to Reply #18 |
| 19. That still makes no sense. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dixiegrrrrl
|
Mon Dec-08-08 10:50 AM Response to Reply #19 |
| 20. Medical device for removing people who illegally use handicap parking zones. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Mon Dec-08-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 22. Does a motorized wheelchair perform medicine? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Mon Dec-08-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 28. There's a medical reason to have a motorized wheelchair. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Mon Dec-08-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 30. What's the medical purpose of having a motorized one? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Mon Dec-08-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 32. Sorry, but that's not a good enough reason for the government to subsidize this. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Mon Dec-08-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 34. Thank you for sharing your personal opinion |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Shardik
|
Mon Dec-08-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 23. Not surprised that you would defend this. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Mon Dec-08-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 24. I neither defend nor oppose it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Mon Dec-08-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 29. The issue isn't whether they have the right to defend themselves. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Mon Dec-08-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 31. It's medical because it allows a person who cannot fire a normal gun to fire a gun |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Renew Deal
|
Mon Dec-08-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 33. Not good enough. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Mon Dec-08-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 35. Sez you. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Shardik
|
Mon Dec-08-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 36. Wow. What are you? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Mon Dec-08-08 07:40 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 39. I'm not sure I should bother with this, but I will answer your last question |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Shardik
|
Mon Dec-08-08 08:26 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 41. You probably shouldn't have bothered. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Fire_Medic_Dave
|
Mon Dec-08-08 08:40 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 43. Wow so you don't want to know the truth you'd rather rely on your opinion. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Tue Dec-09-08 08:50 AM Response to Reply #41 |
| 44. My "ilk"? I'm just someone who believes in giving people as many choices as possible. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DonEBrook
|
Tue Dec-09-08 09:14 AM Response to Reply #41 |
| 47. There are some assholes who think the Bill of Rights ends after the First Amendment. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AlbertCat
|
Mon Dec-08-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
| 17. Ask Me About My Ungrateful Grandchildren |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel
|
Mon Dec-08-08 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
| 21. Funny, I haven't heard any one cry about CCP for the elderly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| benEzra
|
Mon Dec-08-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 26. Grandpa can get a CHL and carry a conventional handgun... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| benEzra
|
Mon Dec-08-08 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. It's the Brady Campaign's dream gun...a single-shot 9mm with no sights. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The Sushi Bandit
|
Mon Dec-08-08 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. BETTER LINK TO STORY HERE: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Shardik
|
Mon Dec-08-08 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 38. After review, I can't get over how NUTS this idea is. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Mon Dec-08-08 07:41 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 40. You have a problem with devices that prevent accidental discharges, and make a shot more accurate? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Shardik
|
Mon Dec-08-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 42. Arthritis? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Tue Dec-09-08 08:53 AM Response to Reply #42 |
| 45. I wasn't aware that levels of ability were either all or nothing |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LeftHander
|
Tue Dec-09-08 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
| 46. They are working on a model for babies... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Jun 20th 2013, 04:31 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC