Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh NOES! Supreme Court rejects case arguing that Obama is ineligible to be president

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 09:36 AM
Original message
Oh NOES! Supreme Court rejects case arguing that Obama is ineligible to be president
Court won't review Obama's eligibility to serve


WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth.



http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28111773/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bwahahahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. this was always a non issue, cant believe it was ever made an issue. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. OMG, the USSC is part of 'The Grate Muslin Conspearrissie'!
Edited on Mon Dec-08-08 09:44 AM by liberalmuse
You know the Freepers will never stop this shit. I normally have compassion for the mentally ill, but it's hard when someone chooses to be nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. here is a post of some of the feedback
'To: dman4384

Clearly its over, but to anyone who thinks about this in a critical manner, its clear that he had a terrible secret to hide.
:::::::::::
And along with this, it is CLEAR that the SCOTUS is more interested in politics, than it is upholding the LAW OF THE CONSTITUTION. We continue to enter a very sad time in American history whereby the example of the SCOTUS and Obama, et al, is encouraging the people to avoid and break the law to accomplish their objectives, good or bad.

A complete travesty of justice, if there really is any left in America.'
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
sounds like me back in 2000, oddly, concerning SCOTUS' selection of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. They didn't feel that way in 2000!
What morans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Imagine: The US Supreme Court was a sleeper cell all along
This was why they gave the 2000 election to Bush: so he could appoint even more members like Alito and Roberts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Oh Noees! It was an 'mergency appeal too!

What shall happen to us now???

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Snort - LOLz - Haha. Suck it, Freepers.
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. Can a Muslim be president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep 16th 2014, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC