Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush admin tool cites 'Chuck and Larry' defense to deprive same-sex couple fed benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 12:14 PM
Original message
Bush admin tool cites 'Chuck and Larry' defense to deprive same-sex couple fed benefits
by: Pam Spaulding
Tue Dec 02, 2008 at 09:00:00 AM EST

January 20 cannot get here soon enough. I've had it with these brain-dead bigoted tools of the Bush Admin who reach high up in their posteriors to pull out BS like this to justify discrimination. http://thinkprogress.org/2008/12/01/chuck-and-larry-defense/">Think Progress:

In September, the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?Fuseaction=Hearings.Detail&HearingID=4567a0c5-c026-461d-8b28-d30898f5e3d9">considered legislation that would provide federal benefits to same-sex domestic partners of federal employees. Howard Weizmann, the deputy director of the U.S. Office Of Personnel Management, objected to the bill because it "http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/_files/092408Weizmann.pdf">could lead to fraud and abuse in the programs we administer." Weizmann claimed that the office was unaware of any interest from federal employees for such benefits. He even evoked a fictional movie plot of two heterosexual New York firefighters who pretend to be a gay couple to suggest such fraud http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2008/12/01/open-season/">would be a problem in real life:

First of all, to suggest that we are being far-fetched in the sense that these benefits are open to fraud or abuse. It's not an unrealistic concern. I would suggest even Hollywood has discussed this in a movie with Adam Sandler. In which, I think, 'Chuck and Larry' get married, which the subject of the movie, was quite frankly, was insurance fraud, along the lines of what we're discussing. This is not far fetched and it's not disingenuous to suggest such.


Should we remove fed benefits from heterosexual couples because some marry under false pretenses in order to obtain a green card for the immigrant spouse?

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=8460

I've known plenty of straight AND gay people who have married for the exclusive purpose of either citizenship or insurance. Using the 'Chuck & Larry' defense to deny rights just to the LGBT community is myopic, which shouldn't come as any surprise from the Bush administration.

I also belong to a private email group with a lot of inside knowledge about what is going down with this bill. It passage looks promising once the Bushies have taken their strangle-hold off of progress in this country. FOr those in support of same-sex marriage, you can chalk this up as a major development in equality.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. All the more reason for single payer national health insurance for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. So when does Bush get dry humped by Chris Farley?
Edited on Tue Dec-02-08 12:19 PM by Bornaginhooligan
Because he got into office illegally, just like in that movie "Black Sheep."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dumb comedy movies
should now be used as justifications for discriminatory policies? Is this like the Bush is Batman nonsense that was going around after that movie was release?

It's pretty pathetic when RW shills use fictional characters as examples of why we should or shouldn't do something. How about plugging into reality for a change?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillWilliam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's one thing for BushCo to have their collective heads up their arses.
It's quite another for them to admire the view.

How silly, desperate, and stupid do they have to sound (and they get worse by the second) before the rest of us finally rise up and say, "Awwwright, that's enough. Sit back down at the kid's table where you belong and let the adults continue talking."?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. GOP Way deprive 100% because of 0.001%
Edited on Tue Dec-02-08 12:38 PM by LeftHander
Brilliant argument...(NOT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. "unaware of any interest from federal employees"
{insert primal scream here} :grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Take a big, deep breath with me.
In less than 50 days this will ALL change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. What will happen in less than 50 days?
It sounds like you know something I don't... :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The adults are back in power.
Former HRC staff have quietly been lobbying to enact this Bill. I've got a feeling that within the next year, we may see some major progress...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC