Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alaska voter turnout may set a record

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:46 AM
Original message
Alaska voter turnout may set a record
OVER 320,000: Eyebrows were raised with early tally, but nearly a third of ballots counted after Nov. 4.
http://www.adn.com/election/story/591659.html

Alaska voter turnout for this year's election appears now on track to be the highest ever.

That's contrary to hand-wringing about why Alaskans didn't show up for this historic election, and even some speculation that ballots weren't being counted.

"I think people were premature to jump to conclusions that voter turnout was very low. It's apparent that a large number of people in this state chose to vote absentee versus in person on Election Day," said Gail Fenumiai, state elections division director.

The state will count the final absentee and questioned ballots Tuesday -- about 24,000 of them. Even if a third of the questioned ballots are disqualified, that will put the turnout above 320,000, the most Alaskans who have ever voted.

(snip)
This year's turnout looked far smaller in the immediate aftermath of Election Day -- potentially lower than the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections.

(snip)
The Huffington Post, one of the most popular liberal Web sites in the country, posed the question "Stolen Election From Alaska?" and said something stinks at the state Division of Elections. National newspaper Web sites and TV talk shows questioned what happened. A Daily News headline called the turnout puzzling, and Anchorage pollster Moore suggested that "something smells fishy," although he said it was premature to suggest conduct of the election was suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yay!
This makes me feel better.

When anyone asked me why I wasn't going to absentee vote, THIS is why. I wanted to give the fuckers less time to let my vote just "disappear."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichellesBFF Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Alaska question
Can someone tell me why they get 3 electoral votes? NYS turned out more than 2x that for each of our electoral votes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suji to Seoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. 2 Senators + 1 at-large Congressman = 3 electoral votes
That's the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. make their welfare check (the bribe from the oil companies)
hinge on whether or not they voted ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Begich need six hundred more votes and it is a lock
There is an automatic recount if there is less than .05% difference between the two candidates. If Begich gets another six hundred votes he will be beyond that threshhold, as he already has over a thousand vote lead right now and still thirty thousand ballots yet to be counted...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC