Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

End of third parties?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
GreenInNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:12 PM
Original message
End of third parties?
Nader, Barr and McKinney received 1% of the national vote combined, heck our candidate for Soil and Water Commissioner in Mecklenburg County, NC got almost twice as many votes as McKinney got nationally.

Do third parties have a chance here in the US or have they had their place in the sun and are fading away? I have a little history here: I was a national co-chair of the Green Party during the 2004 national elections so I know intimately what they are up against.

Even in states where they have few hurdles to leap to get on the ballot the results were not good for these three.

This thread is not a place to interject your personal feelings concerning the candidates but just simply a question about the viability of third parties in our electoral system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope not.
Breaking up the 2 party system is the change I want to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree. One of the third parties will fill in the void left by the GOP. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Third-party candidates got enough to keep Michelle Bachmann in her seat,
and to send the Coleman-Franken race to a hand count, in Minnesota.

I think if they'd work from the bottom up, as they've done in Minnesota over the last 15 years, they'd have better luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenInNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. many states require them to run in the higher up races
For example here in NC for a party to retain it's ballot access it has to garner 2% of the vote in the Governor or Presidential race so they have to run candidates in these races, no other ones count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenInNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. Candidates don't get votes
They earn them and no candidate should think they deserve a person's vote just because of the party they belonng to.

It is up to our Democratic Party to show that we have the best interests of a voter in mind. That is how we earn their vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. No
The GOP is in decline and is becoming a regional party. Probably by the next election, another party will form and eventually it will become the second major party, replacing the GOP.
My guess is that the new party will probably be old line traditional Republican types, people who want small government, isolationist, and NOT the religious nuts. The GOP will be the party of the religious nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Without runoff thresholds there will be no viable 3rd parties.
Maybe if Teddy Roosevelt and the Bull Moose Party had won back then, things would be different now, but they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Third parties can become the first or second party when there are realignments.
We didn't start out with the exact 2 parties we have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1awake Donating Member (852 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. The problem with all the thrid parties we have
is they're not really third parties to begin with. They are reflections of the ones we already have. For a third party to really work, one would be needed that stands apart much more from the other two than what we have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. One of the only issues that the Democrats and Republiks agree on.
Nobody else is allowed play.

I don't know, but if things are not greatly improved over the next 4 years, we may see a resurgence of interest in alternatives to these two.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. No, just that third parties should start doing what they used to do
RUN LOCALLY and build constituencies before going for broke

to the national level

The GRAND exception to this was the GOP, that was formed in 1854 and won the presidency in 1860

But third parties need to start running for local and state offices and prepare those people to run nationally, and get traction that way

This is the way it was done back in the 19th century and the third parties controlled the destiny of the nation by taking HOUSE seats where they became that important in the 188os and set the way for the New Deal, in fact (Read the history of the Granger party)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenInNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. states require them to run for up ballot races
For example here in NC for a party to retain it's ballot access it has to garner 2% of the vote in the Governor or Presidential race so they have to run candidates in these races, no other ones count.

There are other states that also require this so until these laws are changed, the third parties will run in these states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Good point... and those laws were passed by both Rs and Ds
Because of the granger pary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenInNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. here in NC
Our tough laws were passed as a result of the Socialist Party getting on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cemaphonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Their place in the sun?
Wasn't that the 2 decades before the civil war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. No, read about the Grangers
read about the US Communist Party, WELL AFTER the CIvil War
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. Did third parties ever BEGIN? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenInNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. not in Ga they didn't
Ga. is ranked #2 as the state that has the toughest ballot access laws in the US, just behind Oklahoma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Yes, let me mention one that you are familiar with
the grand old party... remember them?

They replaced the WHIG party

which replaced the Tories.

Then there are the Farmers Democrats, which these days have been absorbed by the dems, you may even know one of their latest candidates, Al Franken.

There are days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. we need more than ever to abolish the two-corporate-party system
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't like the idea of third parties anymore.
Imagine if this race had been between Obama, McCain, and Clinton running with a third party. No thanks.

It seems like this problem crops up all the time in other countries where the left will be split into different factions and the right will win even though they are in the minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Or,
imagine an election in which people, not brain-washed to see only two of the choices on their ballots as viable, choose between four or five choices based on actual issues and record.

Where all candidates, of all parties, would be accountable for their record and their positions, and where elections would be decided based on that, and not based on the lesser of two evils.

Where people voted FOR the candidate of their choice, instead of AGAINST the enemy.

I wish I could live to see that happen, but I'm not optimistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC