Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"In our system, the decision to convict is made before the trial, not after."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:14 PM
Original message
"In our system, the decision to convict is made before the trial, not after."
The quote is from Li Jianquiang, a human rights defender in China (who is not pleased about the current system there).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. George would be so happy there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Same here in the US.. otherwise nothing would ever go to trial...
Edited on Sat Mar-17-07 09:32 PM by MazeRat7
After all if the "prosecutor" (eg fed, state, country, et al) did not make a "decision to convict" prior to going to trial... there would not be a trial.

Granted, the final "decision of guilt" after the fact is supposed to rest with a panel of our peers.. but that sometimes has its problems as well. :)

MZr7




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, George would just love that
And, hmm, China is SUCH a human rights offender. Wonder why shrubbie didn't want to get rid of that "regime." Oh, they make our shoes cheap, that's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Maybe he's smart enough to recognize that World War 3 wouldn't be a good idea?
Wonder why shrubbie didn't want to get rid of that "regime."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Well sure WWIII wouldn't be a good idea
Bush smart? Hardly. Even if we could "win" against China and establish democracy, we wouldn't do it because corporate America wants the cheap labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wooow! They have *trials*? We just get sent to gitmo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. What A Ridiculous Statement That Is. You Realize That Right? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. "Hyperbolic", my dear OM, "hyperbolic".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Two words
make the difference between despotism and freedom, Jury Nullification. The law, as well as the defendant is on trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jonathan50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Just say the words "jury nullification" in court
And see how fast you are hustled out of there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Absofuckinglutly.
And how is it that the state is capable of stifling debate amongst the jurors of their dubious intentions and not be standing trial themselves for jury tampering?

If I were all powerful and passed a law saying you must adore and celebrate my rule over you, and then force all jurors to find you guilty without debate if you are found lacking in doing so, what would your feelings about freedom be at that point?

Never tell the prosecutor you are not a mindless drone. Once you are in deliberations, his job is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. Countdown to the 2008 Summer Olympics!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC