Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I want a test on the ballot.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:50 PM
Original message
I want a test on the ballot.
The President of the United States has the power to:
a) sign bills into law
b) decide court cases
c) hire and fire members of Congress

The President of the United States is elected to a term of:
a) two years
b) four years
c) as long as he/she wants

The current President of the United States is:
a) Bill Clinton
b) John McCain
c) George W. Bush

The document which is the foundation of all American law is:
a) The United States Code of Criminal Justice
b) The Constitution
c) The Bible

Miss one? Ballot gets shredded. Sorry, but you gotta have a basic understanding of what you're voting for.

I've been in too many "debates" with voters who would fail this ridiculously simple test.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Voting Rights Act of 1965
No tests
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Needs to be amended. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Just imagine Karl Rove picking the questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. There are all sorts of variables in ballot & election design
which somehow meet a reliable test of impartiality. This would be another one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Really? For a lot of people the answer to question #4 is "c".
The GOP would ensure that the people administering the test would only pass those that answered "correctly".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. And a poll tax!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I see...people having to know for what they're voting
equates to having to pay money. Got it. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. No, but back in the "Bad Old Days," tests were a big form of voter disenfranchisement
I think it's good that we've relegated them to the dustbin with grandfather clauses and poll taxes. I think the solution is to have a national curriculum for US politics and government, and make sure that everyone takes it. I know in Illinois it's required to graduate HS, but I'm not sure about anywhere else.

Also, a 30 minute PSA where they replay all the "Constitution rock" videos from school house rock would be cool, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. There isn't anyone who would be disenfranchised by a test like this
except those who are ignorant on the very principles they're deciding. Whoever they are - they're not doing any of us any good.

You could even put a page of basic government information in the voter pamphlet which *answers* all the questions. It's gonna require that somebody crack it open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. bullshit
Edited on Sat Oct-18-08 08:15 PM by bigtree
I can't even believe I'm hearing this

In 1890, Southern states began to adopt explicit literacy tests to disenfranchise voters. This had a large differential racial impact, since 40-60% of blacks were illiterate, compared to 8-18% of whites. Poor, illiterate whites opposed the tests, realizing that they too would be disenfranchised. To placate them, Southern states adopted an "understanding clause" or a "grandfather clause," which entitled voters who could not pass the literacy test to vote, provided they could demonstrate their understanding of the meaning of a passage in the constitution to the satisfaction of the registrar, or were or were descended from someone eligible to vote in 1867, the year before blacks attained the franchise. Discriminatory administration ensured that blacks would not be eligible to vote through the understanding clause. However, illiterate whites also felt the impact of the literacy tests, since some of the understanding and grandfather clauses expired after a few years, and some whites were reluctant to expose their illiteracy by publicly resorting to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. How can they vote if they can't read the ballot? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. you're proving to be an idiot here
I'll let someone else deal with you. You won't get far with that. I'm even going to make you the second person on my ignore list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Can't answer the question?
Whatever. It would be an honor to put you on my list as well. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. WHY DON'T YOU GET A FUCKING BRAIN & READ SOME HISTORY YOU FOOL!
Edited on Sat Oct-18-08 08:57 PM by baldguy
Blacks weren't allowed to vote BECAUSE THEY WERE BLACK - NOT BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T READ! The "literacy teats" were just an excuse, "poll taxes" were just an excuse - for evil people to keep power for themselves at the expense of their fellow citizens.

In a democracy EVERYONE IS ALLOWED TO VOTE. The more people vote, the better. THAT'S THE WAY IT'S SUPPOSED TO WORK.

Stop taking lessons from the bad guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. It's not a requirement to be smart or educated in order to be a citizen
and to have the civil rights of a citizen. Thank goodness there wasn't any kind of basic civics test when America was still a new nation; hardly any of those small-time farmers, smiths, and merchants would have qualified.

The truth is that you don't need a lot of education to vote your best interests. You just need politicians who don't lie to you so much. That's the goal we should be shooting for--not restricting civil rights to only those who "qualify."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. It's still unconstitutional, and a bad idea.
Who gets to make these tests? Who chooses the questions? How do you administer them in a fair way? I mean, sure, I'm with you on the whole "people should know how their government works," but not up for putting anything in the modern voter disenfranchisement toolbox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. how about a poll tax?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalNative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. The good news would be
that most of the Freepers wouldn't be able to pass it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's what we need...
more people being disqualified from voting. I think we should go back to white land owners only. If you rent or have a mortgage you're out. Easy peasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC