Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

General breakdown of demographics of who's for and against bailout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:42 AM
Original message
General breakdown of demographics of who's for and against bailout

FOR:

Likely married
Likely with children
Likely own home
Likely employed


AGAINST:

Likely single
Likely childless
Likely rent
Likely student, unemployed, or retired


That's VERY general... and lots of people who are married parents who are employed and have jobs are against the bailout. Similarly, lots of single childless renters are for the bailout.


But IN GENERAL... I think that's the demographic. Single folks aren't as afraid of economic uncertainty because they know they can survive hard times and have no others who depend on them.

Those with families are more fearful, because the quality of life of the people that depend on them is one of their main concerns.


But I have a message for the second group:

If the credit freeze isn't thawed... your rent will go up as your landlords start to have trouble paying the bills. You won't be able to get your next student loan. If you're unemployed, work will be hard to come by. Retired folks... I hope your money isn't in money markets and I hope you don't have a reverse mortgage to fund your retirement.



I seriously hope I am wrong about what all this means... Sincerely.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lostnotforgotten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Single, Childless, Own Home, Employed - Against The Bailout!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well... the last two are in jeopardy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxBlue Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Where the heck did you come up with those demographics
being for or against??

Marital status, home ownership, job status doesn't seem to equate to being able to smell something not right.


Like Dave Letterman sez: "Something smells"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Married, employed, "own" home, 2 kids, and against..
...the bail out plan offered up today (err, yesterday now).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Acknowledged in the OP... You're in the minority in your demographic, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Is the question framed to say against ANY bailout, or specifically
the current legislation? That might make a diff to the outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I think ANY bailout. Can the current leg. be improved? Surely.... but it needs 219 votes

No legislation is perfect.


But this legislation was "good enough" for now. Only $250B committed up front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm single, childless, rent and am for it
because I get macroeconomics.

You're right that the former group is likelier to be for it, according to my theory, because their status as providers compels them to understand how markets work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. I have my own theory
People see the bail out in two ways, nicely summed up by the dictionary:

bail 2 (bl)
v. bailed, bail·ing, bails
v.tr.
1. To remove (water) from a boat by repeatedly filling a container and emptying it over the side.
2. To empty (a boat) of water by bailing.
v.intr.
To empty a boat of water by bailing.
n.
A container used for emptying water from a boat.
Phrasal Verb:
bail out
1. To parachute from an aircraft; eject.
2. To abandon a project or enterprise.

In other words, some see it as trying to bail out water to save a sinking ship of state. Others see it as a privileged few with golden parachutes jumping from a plane on a doomed course which they are trapped on. Its a line that I think cuts across both demographics, to be frank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnotforgotten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Version Two For Me - As The Plane Is The Titanic And It Cannot Be Saved!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
25. Its number two for a lot of people it seems...
And the real thing is that they both seem kind of futile. Even with number one it feels like the're endlessly bailing water but the leak that's letting it in goes unfixed. What I want to know is where is our economic deliverance package, something that gets us out of the boat entirely to safety...Something that leads us into a new practical sustainable lifestyle. That's something I could get behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. Married. Children. Own Home. Own Business. Own Stocks. AGAINST. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnotforgotten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Well That's No Fun - All Assumptions Blown - Sorry, Needed A Little Levity
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Your home, business, and certainly stocks are at risk. In reverse order.

Your stocks are already toast today... and it won't stop soon.

Your business will be unable to secure credit when it needs it. Hope you have lots of cash reserves.


And then... when your business fails.... say bye-bye to your home when you can no longer pay the mortgage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes, I'm certain you know more about my home and business than I do.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ditto, except only one child. Against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
15. Widowed, 2 grown children, own home, full time job -- TOTALLY AGAINST.
Your absurd attempt to pin down some sort of pro/con demographic is just silly,

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. Furthermore, if you're single and lose your job, you have no second income
to fall back on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. Why do you think RETIRED people on pensions have nothing to lose?
I'm concerned about my parents' pension fund, but I'm way more concerned about hyperinflation. What part of THERE IS NO BAND AID SOLUTION do you not get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
19. Pure nonsense.
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 03:02 AM by TexasObserver
FOR:

Likely not cognizant during any previous boom and bust cycle
Likely never heard about matters of finance before two weeks ago
Likely easily frightened and tending to economic gullibility
Likely uses far too much credit and already can't pay bills

AGAINST:

Likely uses credit wisely, instead of as a way of living
Likely has not borrowed against the equity in their home, and is not overleveraged
Likely has lived through other boom and busts, and realize this one will be survived
Likely not given to hysteria on a daily basis
Likely had sense enough to move out of the DOW at 14,000, or 13,000, or 12,000

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxBlue Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. lol Love IT! That's my demographic - Against
FOR:

Likely not cognizant during any previous boom and bust cycle
Likely never heard about matters of finance before two weeks ago
Likely easily frightened and tending to economically gullibility
Likely uses far too much credit and already can't pay bills

AGAINST:

Likely does uses credit wisely, instead of as a way of living
Likely has not borrowed against the equity in their home, and is not overleveraged
Likely has lived through other boom and busts, and realize this one will be survived
Likely not given to hysteria on a daily basis
Likely had sense enough to move out of the DOW at 14,000, or 13,000, or 12,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. The DOW dropped from 14K to 11K in under a year. You reckon it's time to get out?
Naw, let it ride!! It can't go further, can it?!

I had to beg some friends and relatives to get out at 13K. I warned them off of WAMU, Merrill Lynch and Wachovia months ago. Some listened, and some didn't.

I frankly do not understand how anyone can think $700 billion is enough to do more than save a handful of companies that do not deserve to be saved. Let the bad ones fail and the good ones pick up the pieces. There are five star rated community banks all over America, and they're open for business. They didn't get infected with the "virus" of bad paper the BIGS caught.

The problem is in the trillions and trillions of dollars, and one trillion will not slow this correction down much. Think plate tectonics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxBlue Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #22
24.  I reckon it's past time
this dog don't hunt no more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. I meet every one of your qualifications for against. And I'm against!
What do I win?

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. You win ...
... my respect and gratitude.

I think those of us who learned the joy of avoiding debt - particularly for the obligatory bigger, better and newer - tend to look askance at those who surf through life on a wall of debt, consumer debt often many times the annual income of many citizens.

Bank Holding Companies are the "dealers" and credit cards are the "street drug" of this century. They've hooked many of the population, who cannot imagine life without saying "charge it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. I've noticed that we have many Texans...
in our camp.

I lived through the 80s boom and bust and witnessed my parents' struggles. Experience is one hell of a teacher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. the late 80s BUST in Texas was UG-LY!!
It was worse than this by far. All the local banks went bust and the big city banks swooped in and took over their assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
20. Parents shouldn't be for the bailout because their children will be enslaved to it.
How do you want your economic crisis? Fast and deep or slow and terminal. I'm going with the former but that's based on the fact that the Bush Administration is trying to ram it through, so I'm assuming it's what benefits their interests.

My family does not want the bailout and neither do I. We all own houses. Some are retirees whose pensions are invested in the market. Some are unemployed. None of us trust Bush as far as we can throw him. All of us would rather see a collapse of Wall Street in a month than hyperinflation, the collapse of Wall Street and the permanent destruction of the US in 6 months after the Bushistas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
27. I'm married with a 4 year old and a mortage and my wife and I are both self-employed and I'm against
I'm against THIS bailout. Obviously there needs to be some kind of action but this wasn't the right course of action.

I think you got your demographics reversed. It's the people who can't think toward the future who supported this poorly crafted bailout. The people who are living moment to moment and who are more concerned with a market crash this week than what the future decades have in store for our country. I would say that the supporters probably skew young and childless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
29. I've done a little demographic research and come to these findings:
The people in favor of this bailout are:

- Likely to buy extended warantees
- Likely to act now for this limited time offer
- Likely to help out the nice Nigerian man
- Likely to get hot stock tips from Cramer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC