Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mad Money Cramer: FDIC Key to Stop Banking Collapse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:44 PM
Original message
Mad Money Cramer: FDIC Key to Stop Banking Collapse
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. needs to increase its guarantee limit right now, Cramer said during Monday’s Stop Trading!, to stop a collapse in banking.

The Mad Money host has said before that the FDIC’s $100,000 deposit insurance might have been suitable for the Great Depression era, but not the 21st century. Cramer’s calling for that limit to be increased to $1 million. He also wants to see corporate accounts, which carry with them much more money, insured for a fee, even if it’s as small as 0.1%.

There’s a “jarring lack of confidence throughout the system,” and Cramer doesn’t want to see the market “destroyed” over the next 72 hours because of today’s vote in Congress. The FDIC, though, despite all the failures we’ve seen recently, does seem to still hold the trust of both the market and the average American.

“So maybe that’s the agency we bank with,” Cramer said, “while we get through this period.”

When asked what his one message to the American people would be, Cramer replied that sometimes you have to vote against the popular perception. Because often that perception is “not knowledgeable or sophisticated.” This is one such case.

“Any sophisticated analysis indicates that we’re about to lose our banking system,” Cramer said, “if not the Western world’s banking system. So just forget about the cutting your nose off to spite your face. We have to do this. We have to do this because we don’t want 20% unemployment, because we do not want a repeat of the Great Depression.”

http://www.cnbc.com/id/26945336
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. nope $100,000 is reasonable
especially since people can spread their funds out across multiple banks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I don't want people doing that right now all at once.
That would cause chaos throughout the banking system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. isn't he just so cute and funny with his obnoxious attempts at humor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrownPrinceBandar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't this what J.K. Galbraith proposed?.........
I can't find a linky, but I thought he proposed something along those lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Doesn't that mean massive insurance cost increases for banks?
And how exactly would that work right now. That's like someone getting a life insurance policy today and the beneficiary killing them tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. And in other news water is wet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Complete CRAP. If someone were smart enough to accumulate...
more than $100,000 they are also smart enough to have spread out the risk. Then again, if you happen to have more money than there are banks to spread it between then I guess you would be worried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Making sense - WHEN they fail, we bail depositors out. Not before. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Even a stopped clock like Cramer is right every now and then.
The few runs that have occurred have happened because people were draining their deposits in excess of $100,000 from banks. The 100k figure is from back in the '80s. Before that it was only 10k.

Increase the insurance. It's a very small premium anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC