Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are we REALLY under Martial law right now?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Iwasthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:51 PM
Original message
Are we REALLY under Martial law right now?
Edited on Sun Sep-28-08 01:55 PM by Patmccccc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hard to do when your army is in another couple of countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. weds, oct 1 we depoly a brigade to the homeland to quell civil unrest.
bye bye, posse comitatus and the bill of rights. 3rd infantry, I think it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Anybody ask Obama about that yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Martial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. That would be Martial Law, and I think not. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No, it's Marshal Law.
He's the guy that replaced Marshal Dillon.

We're all under him now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Nope.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Festus for VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Speaker of the House cannot declare Marshall Law.
The rep was using it as a metaphor to say they have been instructed to stay in Washington until something is done. :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, but I'm listening to Marshall Dylan on the hifi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yup, there's a new marshal in town


:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. info here
The martial law concept in the U.S. is closely tied with the right of habeas corpus, which is in essence the right to a hearing on lawful imprisonment, or more broadly, the supervision of law enforcement by the judiciary. The ability to suspend habeas corpus is often equated with martial law. Article 1, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution states, "The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion, the public Safety may require it."

In United States law, martial law is limited by several court decisions that were handed down between the American Civil War and World War II. In 1878, Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids military involvement in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval. The Military Commissions Act of 2006 possibly rescinds these limits by suspending habeas corpus, but the law is not clear on whether it applies to U.S. Citizens. Since, USNORTHCOM <5> has increased its direct involvement with civilian administration


wikipedia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. coming oct 1...! but i'm sure it's, er, innocent. yeah, right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. coming oct 1...! but i'm sure it's, er, innocent. yeah, right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Are you REALLY serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Rep. Burgess plainly says "I understand we are under martial law
as declared by the Speaker last night."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Wow. DUers really will believe anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Actually, it's parliamentary procedure. Forces members to vote on
Edited on Sun Sep-28-08 02:10 PM by Texas Explorer
bills.

Edited: I don't know if that's a valid technical term in the House. It could also be a metaphor (see post #4) applied to a parliamentary procedure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Which is not the meaning that the OP assigned it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. True that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. No, that's just more GOP fearmongering. n/t



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endthewar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
21. In context, it sounds like something that is specific to Congressional members
Sounded like they issued some type of Congressional edict to members of Congress. Probably a procedural issue in order to keep them in session when they had a scheduled vacation to go back and campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ITsec Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. Martial law under house rules....
Among the matters the House may be asked to vote on under martial law are a major conference report on pension legislation, a costly bill that would permanently reduce the estate tax and extend certain expiring tax provisions, and a bill that could combine a controversial health insurance proposal with an increase in the minimum wage (there also are reports that the estate tax, minimum wage, and expiring tax provisions may be combined into a single bill). The House Rules Committee on Thursday afternoon reported a resolution that would provide martial law authority in relation to all of these bills.

Under the martial law procedure, longstanding House rules that require at least one day between the unveiling of significant legislation and the House floor vote on that legislation — so that Members can learn what they are being asked to vote on — are swept away. Instead, under “martial law,” the Leadership can file legislation with tens or hundreds of pages of fine print and move immediately to debate and votes on it, before Members of Congress, the media, or the public have an opportunity to understand fully what provisions have been altered or inserted into the legislation behind closed doors. This is the procedure that the Leadership intends to use to muscle through important bills in the next two days.


...more explained here...

http://www.cbpp.org/7-28-06bud-stmt.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC