|
Edited on Sat Sep-27-08 12:35 AM by Cherchez la Femme
I guess it's a fine line, the 'black man not wanting to look angry', but I was very upset with Sen. Obama appearing to let McBush walk all over him. IMO, in these kind of debates, you retort point for point -- this election is too important to let anything go; ESPECIALLY standard, immoral Repuke shenanigans. In one case I remember, Mr. Obama had a chance to speak and respond to the crap Mighty Mouse was spewing but instead he just waved it off -- he let McAssholes bullshit go unchallenged and he had plenty of ammunition.
You leave it unchallenged, uncorrected, and people who aren't in the know are going to assume it's true.
McCain got his 'talking points' in time and again; I would have called bullshit -- not swear of course (on TV) but I would have brought up he being condescending and arrogant and told him why he was without merit.
I'm sorry, but I'm not happy with this debate. Obama got his talking points in, made lots of good comments but lessened their overall effect by this. To the average viewer I mean, of course not to the usually astute DU type -- we know better, but there are LOTS of ignorant prospective voters out there and all they know is what they see on the "Liberal" msm. Lord help us.
I also would have hit McLame a lot harder on his 90+ percent voting record with King George causing most if not all of our current problems. And where was repeating McSame's own comment about how little he knew about Economics? If it was talked about, I didn't see it. All this should have been hammered home. As that * said (probably gotten from Rove who while hateful IS effective): "Catapault the propaganda" because, obviously and unfortunately, it works much better than polite, considerate, good-natured Truth especially when executed in fair play.
|