Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lehman Execs To Share In $2.5 BILLION In Bonuses!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:07 PM
Original message
Lehman Execs To Share In $2.5 BILLION In Bonuses!
Oh. My. Gawd.

Just out of curiosity: is this in any *American* papers?

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/09/key-lehman-employees-to-get-25-billion.html

"For those who thought outsized pay for investment bankers and traders was a thing of the past, think again. Ditto with the idea that having been a key actor in a financial failure dims one's employment prospects. The poster child is John Meriwether, the head of hedge fund Long Term Capital Management, whose collapse in 1998 nearly caused a systemic crisis, leading the Fed to broker a rescue. Meriwether went on to launch another large hedge fund.

From the UK's Times:

Staff at Lehman’s New York office who helped to cause the world’s biggest corporate bankruptcy are to share in a $2.5 billion bonanza.

The bonus, which has been described by London staff as a “scandal” has been pledged by Barclays Capital, the British-based bank that last week acquired Lehman’s American operation and took on 10,000 staff.

The $2.5 billion (£1.4 billion) pot, which has been ring-fenced as part of the acquisition, has caused huge resentment among the 5,000 staff in the firm’s European and Middle Eastern operations who are not guaranteed to be paid after this month...

A Chapter 11 bankruptcy document filed by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc says that Barclays has identified eight individuals out of the New York staff of 10,000 who are vital to make the deal succeed and a further 200 who are identified as “key”. It is thought that these eight directors will be locked into two-year contracts worth between $10m and $25m a year."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Speechless.
Any comments made would most certainly involve Agent Mike & Co. making a visit to our home in a black SUV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unbelievable isn't it... I was reading this to my husband last night.... just pathetic n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FedUpWithIt All Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. May they choke on it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Can't choke em if they've already been bludgeoned to death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. I'm liking that idea more and more every day.
car tires soaked in gasoline as neckties work, too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. W.T.F.?!?!?
Republican corporate welfare, and here we see more of the queens.

Guillotines come to mind!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Anyone really surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Business as usual with the Execs sucking the lifeblood from the shareholders/stakeholders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. this is why we can not give them any more money to throw to the rich n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Talk about adding insult to injury
and then rubbing some salt into the wound, UNBELIEVABLE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It's like the rapIST suing the rapEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes, and then demanding
that the rapee be ostracized for being a lousy lay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. ask yourself - are they democrats?
or republicans.
what do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. this is the way it works when companies are taken over or restructured
"key" people are paid serious retention bonuses and locked into 3-year contracts while non-key people are subject to layoff.
if you're a favorite of one of the key people, you're safe; otherwise, you're screwed.

note that the bonuses are not for previous performance; it's for staying and making sure the transition works properly.

i'm not saying it's fair -- it isn't. but it is the way it's usually done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. "The way it's usually done" needs
to be changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. better can (and should) be done when government bailouts are involved.
but in lehman's case, it's much closer to your garden variety bankruptcy (not exactly, though, there is some government support involved).

the usual problem in bankruptcy is that there's obviously not enough money to go around, so some people must be let go. and it's not in anyone's interest to let the company completely fall apart (how else to the creditors get paid?) hence the retention bonuses to key people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
An Intellectual Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Jail those fucking thieves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. I've said it before. That's Barclays problem. If they're dumb enough
to be willing to pay it, so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gblady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. f'n unbelievable.....
they should have to give that money to where the bail out $$$ are going...
how can they get away with this robbery....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
19. Whew! That's a relief. It's good to know that the Americans will remain rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC