Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FEMA and Texas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:23 AM
Original message
FEMA and Texas
Look folks we are getting reports of mismanagement at historical levels

Logistics chains broken

Food given to people that needs cooking (WTF)

Not enough ice in some areas

Closed off areas

The stadium becoming a small tragedy

Not enough food or water for first responders

Some of you know this, I USED to do this for fun. These are BASIC mistakes. I know, the kind made by well meaning but poorly trained civies, or on purpose

Discuss...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. As your first line states ...

It's a failure of management. Intentional or not, it's still a failure.

From what I've seen, the people on the ground are trying their damnedest to help people, but the organizers within FEMA, the people in the suits, aren't doing shit, and that means the people on the ground aren't able to do their jobs as well as they could.

Well ... I shouldn't be all encompassing. Their PR department is doing a helluva job. They were organized and on-message from the get-go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah but legally it has consequences
if you don't do it on purpose... ok it is being an idiot... and though it should, it is not a crime.

:-)

On purpose... manslaughter at least comes to mind

And I feel sorry for the poor responders TRYING to do their job with no support... I really do

Been there, done that too... why I got into the logistics side of it... in fact... one of many hats... I once wore

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. They learned to handle natural disasters like they handle everything else
A Full Sovietization of Old America is roughly 60-70% complete now.

Inverted Totalitarianism. Mr. Rogers Fascism.

Katrina caught them by surprise. And Old American protocol or more or whatever you want to call it was full access (or close to full, safety-permitting) of the media to disaster areas.

Another Old American ideal eradicated by the Bushies, likely never to return (maybe if Obama is permitted to sit on the throne in January).

How many is that now? 6,742?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think this mess is on purpose unless you count massive disregard
as active evil, which it may be.

I've been wondering if I should just organize this one block in our earthquake/tsunami zone. People will think I'm crazy (they may already, lol) but, if we know who has a baby or who has mobility problems or who has a generator, I don't see a down side.

Cuba drills disaster response. I don't see how you can really be prepared for a disaster without that kind of practice. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Civil defense, you are in california, start by becoming CERT
certified, and go from there

Not a bad idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressive_realist Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. To paraphrase Houston mayor Bill White...
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 02:12 AM by progressive_realist
FEMA overall has done well... but some individuals are operating in a capacity they are inadequate for.

Just goes to show we shouldn't appoint unqualified cronies to sensitive crisis management positions like FEMA, the military's Strategic Command, the Treasury Department, or... the Presidency. The nation can't afford mistakes, poor judgment, or incompetency in any of these roles.

Edit to add clarifying italics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. That pretty much covers the whole Bush government.
Mayor White has understatement down to a fine art.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ya would think they would get it by NOW....them Cronies still there it seems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tannybogus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. Katrina was mismanagement at historical levels.
With Ike coming, FEMA was supposed to have learned some lessons.

They haven't learned anything. That's not only criminal, it's scarey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. The only thing FEMA learned from Katrina is how to control the news
The first responders are doing what they can, they want to help. It was the same with Katrina. It is those at the top who are covering it up. Welcome to an election year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. perhaps privatization
would be the answer if FEMA and the government are unable to get it right time and time again.

Not all of the people working on the ground assisting FEMA in many ways are employed by the federal government, most are local volunteers from all over the country who have flocked there to help. Don't diminish their efforts just because FEMA is lacking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tannybogus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. My remarks are aimed at FEMA!
hey just get in the way of the volunteers who have a clue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. FEMA seems to work great when it's not part of a Bush administration
just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Bush's cut it, Clinton
abused it. Seriously, he handed out FEMA cash for anything and everything. California was a big receiver of FEMA cash even without disasters.

FEMA has been mismanaged and abused ever since Carter created it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Bush tore down the FEMA that Clinton built up
Of all the sad tales of cronyism and ineptitude emerging out of the Katrina catastrophe, probably none is more telling than the history of FEMA under the oversight and management of President Bush.

So let’s review the outlines of the story, beginning with the president’s inauguration in January 2001. Like everything in the second Bush White House, the surest clue to how the administration would proceed was to find what the Clinton White House had done and then expect the opposite.

President Clinton had appointed the first FEMA director with actual emergency-management experience, James Lee Witt. And Witt had gone on to reshape the organization into what was considered a model government agency. Clinton even gave FEMA Cabinet-level status.

Bush demoted the agency’s status and put it in the hands of his chief political fixer, Joe Allbaugh, who went about dismantling much of what Witt had built. As he told Congress in May 2001: “Many are concerned that federal disaster assistance may have evolved into both an oversized entitlement program and a disincentive to effective state and local risk management. Expectations of when the federal government should be involved and the degree of involvement may have ballooned beyond what is an appropriate level.”

http://thehill.com/josh-marshall/bush-tore-down-the-fema-that-clinton-built-up-2005-09-08.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. true
but that does not invalidate that he used FEMA as a political tool. It most certainly was run better under him that either of the Bush's but was still mismanaged and abused, just in a different way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. because you say so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. good read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. I see black people
and georgie still hates them



In Haiti

Yn New Orleans

In Texas

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC