Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Waxman to Rice: Answer 11 ignored letters on Iraq claims

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
133724 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:58 PM
Original message
Waxman to Rice: Answer 11 ignored letters on Iraq claims
The Chairman of the House's Oversight and Government Reform Committee today demanded that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice respond to 11 outstanding requests for information sent by his office since 2003. The letters primarily concerned claims later proved erroneous on the threat posed to the United States by Saddam Hussein's government in the run up to the Iraq War.

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) warned Dr. Rice that a failure to respond to his committee's inquiries undermined Constitutional governance.

"Refusing to allow officials to testify before Congress...or ignoring congressional requests for information, as you apparently ignored my inquiries, are not consistent with our constitutional system of government," said the Committee's Chairman in a letter released today.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Waxman_to_Rice_Answer_11_letters_0312.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. she probably replied under her breath, what constitution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:01 PM
Original message
oops sorry double post
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 01:02 PM by alyce douglas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. When are these BushCo fascists going to get what they deserve?
....Impeach these bastards now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. as long as the GOP/Media Establishment continues to be accomplishes...never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Self delete
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 01:02 PM by whistle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow what happened self delete duplicates
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 01:03 PM by whistle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwasthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I agree
Behind closed doors they are laughing at us... always have been... They think they can do anything they want... IMPEACH NOW!!! No more waiting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. When does this man sleep? We need to clone him. It's pathetic when
the Congress has to beg some executive appointee for answers. I am so sick of this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. send a cc to Air Force One.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. RICE-A-RONI
I would say CC her dentist..............


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Go Henry. Contempt of Congress. Who the f*ck do these people think they are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. sorry for a dumb question, but...
what powers does Waxman have to enforce his request?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. SUBPOENA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. good. And what if she ignores the subpoena?
Can he have her arrested?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheLeftyMom Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. scary part is that she ignored requests when the PUKES were in power too
Not cool. Not cool at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verse18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Rice to Waxman:
"Who, me?!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. Henry's like the Energizer Bunny - keeps going and going Yay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. "..not consistent with our constitutional system of government.."
Damn! I could sit and read that over and over!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. To hell with demand letters Henry,
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 08:54 PM by Justice Is Comin
you already sent her eleven letters! Serve the subpoena. Let them claim their national security if they want. It goes to the very malfeasance of government that no court will sanction.

She may have obstructed justice just by snatching away the guy that was under federal investigation to pre-empt it from continuing.

She already compromised any chance of constitutional cover by answering five of the related letters. That establishes "pattern and practice," which shows she only intended to answer those which she deemed able to be spun.

It's subpoena time HW !!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC