Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Denies Stay: Miers Must Appear Before HJC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:09 PM
Original message
Judge Denies Stay: Miers Must Appear Before HJC
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/08/judge_denies_stay_bolten_and_m.php

Judge Denies Stay; Miers Must Appear to Answer HJC's Subpoena
By Kate Klonick - August 26, 2008, 2:22PM


A district court judge denied Harriet Miers and Joshua Bolten's request for a stay on their Congressional testimony pending the appeal of the recent decision in HJC v. Harriet Miers et al. The decision means that Miers will have to appear in response to the House Judiciary Committee's subpoena for testimony.

From the ruling:

Accordingly, the Court will deny the Executive's request for a stay. Hence, the Executive should respond to the document aspect of the subpoenas by producing non-privileged material and identifying more specifically the materials it is withholding on a claim of executive privilege.

But it is on Ms. Miers's appearance that the dispute principally focuses. This decision should not, however, foreclose the parties' continuing attempts to reach a negotiated solution. Both sides indicated that discussions regarding an accommodation have resumed.


The judge, the Honorable John Bates, has mentioned before that he would really appreciate it if these two parties tried to keep every little squabble out of the court room, and that seemed to be the gist of his ruling:

Had the litigants indicated that a negotiated solution was foreseeable in the near future, the Court may have stayed its hand in the hope that further intervention in this dispute by the Article III branch would not be necessary.

As it stands, however, the Court must decide the questions presented to it. But there is still ample time for the parties to reach an accommodation. The Court's July 31, 2008 Order does not compel Ms. Miers to appear at any particular date.


Technically, this leaves open the possibility of continued negotiations, but considering this administration's history of fighting subpoenas, we're not holding our breath for an out-of-court resolution.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Handcuffs, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeraAgnes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I strongly recommend cuffs
at this phase of their arrogance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Fuck handcuffs.
we should be revolting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Del/dupe
Edited on Tue Aug-26-08 05:33 PM by hisownpetard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Some of us *are.*
Revolting, that is.:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh boy, I can't wait to see her have to march up to Cap Hill
Popcorn please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'd be nervous if I were her.
Hope she has told all her friends that she has no intention of harming herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. bu$hco will keep it in the courts till january....
wish i could negotiate a subpoena.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldem4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Watch these people commit perjury if they ever testify
Miers will defend Bush & Co no matter what-Josh Bolten will too. I sure hope they will have to testify someday.

Now if we can just get Karl Rove to testify he can perjure himself too. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. That's Fine With Me
Just let's not push for an indictment until AFTER 1/20/09...don't give booooshie the chance to "Scooter" them. Let them lie and then once this regime is removed, go full bore after these criminals...ALL of 'em.

Rove's already dug a deep hole and he knows it. He's been daring to be indicted so his buddy georgie can spring the "Get out of Jail" card. I'd sure like to make his life a living hell...bankrupt the bastard through civil suits and then after 1/20/09 nail his ass.

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldem4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I LOVE that plan!
I wasn't thinking about Bush pardoning them, so after he's gone is perfect. I would love to see all those Bush co-conspirators in jail, especially Rove, and Bush and Cheney on trial for being the war criminals that they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. k + 5th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. She's writing notes to W as we type!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLG_News Donating Member (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. They are running out the clock.
The election is a little over 2 months away and Congress doesn't come back in session til September. There will be another challenge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Drip, drip, drip,
Like water on rock, sadly, justice is not speedy in a democracy. But rocks fear water!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Go0d!!1
But I think they'll drag it out and then get pardons like granny's nightgown - covers eberything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. She will just Rove them, and be a no show..
and they will have the hearing with an empty chair..and everyone will huff & puff & Harriet will laugh at them all from her lounge chair as she watched the hearings on tv.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC