Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NPR: Media reports indicating Anthrax scientist Ivins was going to be indicted imminently are False

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 09:16 AM
Original message
NPR: Media reports indicating Anthrax scientist Ivins was going to be indicted imminently are False

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=93250771

NPR.org, August 3, 2008 · Government investigators tell NPR that they were still several major legal steps away from indicting army researcher Dr. Bruce Ivins for the 2001 anthrax attacks when he killed himself this past week.

While they had written up the case and told officials at the Department of Justice they were prepared to go forward, the department had not yet approved the case. What is more, the evidence against Ivins had not yet been presented in its entirety to a grand jury and jurors had not yet been asked to vote on an indictment. That process could have taken weeks.

There had been some media reports saying that Ivins killed himself on Tuesday because he had been told that he was going to be indicted imminently. People close to the case told NPR that the FBI had a discussion with Ivins' lawyer and had presented him with some of the evidence in the case.

But the idea at the time was to convince Ivins' lawyer that it was in his client's best interest to admit to mailing envelopes with anthrax in the fall of 2001. People close to the investigation said it wasn't so much a plea discussion as the FBI making clear that they were steaming toward an indictment of Ivins.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. He may have gotten that info from his Therapist's restraining order.
She says in her complaint that the FBI was going to indict him on 5 counts of murder. He would have gotten a copy of her complaint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. But the therapist's story stinks to high heavens
see related DU thread

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3727237

Republicon black ops apparently at work in this matter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. Yes it does. But even with Bush. At the bottom of the biggest pile of BS you'll find a little truth.
This was true. The FBI was preparing to indict him on 5 counts of murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. You mean the "theripist" with no degree and a history of DUI?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. That's a violation of Maryland Law. It used to be that anyone could call themselves a Psychologist.
You didn't have to have a degree or a license to practise medicine. All you needed was an office with Psychologist on the door and you were in business. Then Maryland passed a law requiring a degree and license. She should be prosecuted. But I have a feeling that much like when we tried to prosecute Linda Tripp for her illegal wiretap of Monica Lewinsky. The feds have probably given her immunity in exchange for testimony. That would be another loose end tied up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bruce Ivins may be Bush/Cheney's Eugene Hassenfus. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. There's A Name Out Of The Deep Dark Contra Past
I hope you're right...there's a lot of the same questions about Ivins, just like Hassenfus...just without a plane.

Methinks this case was supposed to have the lid on it until past the elections, but it appears Mr. Ivins didn't get that memo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevilledog Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Grand Jury proceedings are supposed to be secret.
I only practice at the state level, but by law Grand Jury proceedings are secret and if someone disclosed to Ivins that they had testified before one or if law enforcement told Ivins that one was seated and hearing evidence against him they would be breaking the law. Maybe someone who practices federal criminal law can chime in on this point.

Arizona Revised Statutes 13-2812 - Unlawful grand jury disclosure

A person commits unlawful grand jury disclosure if the person knowingly discloses to another the nature or substance of any grand jury testimony or any decision, result or other matter attending a grand jury proceeding, except in the proper discharge of official duties, at the discretion of the prosecutor to inform a victim of the status of the case or when permitted by the court in furtherance of justice.


Arizona Revised Statutes 13-2813 - Unlawful disclosure of an indictment, information or complaint

A person commits unlawful disclosure of an indictment, information or complaint if the person knowingly discloses the fact than an indictment, information or complaint has been found or filed before the accused person is in custody or has been served with a summons, except in the proper discharge of official duties, at the discretion of the prosecutor to inform a victim of the status of the case or when permitted by the court in furtherance of justice.

Violating either one of those statutes is a class 1 misdemeanor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hell, I'd read he was facing the death penalty. Wow. Someone is
seriously trying to distort this story and what really happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. The AP for one. Look at this:
Is another Bruce Ivins lurking in a biolab?

http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=225460&src=109

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. "Yet Ivins had attempted to poison people as far back as 2000..." interesting Media conclusion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. They took the wild unsubstantiated claims this woman made
at a hearing to get a restraining order and repeat them as fact.

It's disgusting, all around. No one questioned her at the hearing and of course, Authorized Propaganda just spams the world with this cr@p.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. another claim by the person the Media labels a "psychotherapist" --
“He is a revenge killer,” Ms. Duley told a Maryland District Court judge on the tape. “When he feels that he has been slighted, and especially towards women, he plots and actually tries to carry out revenge killings.”

http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/08/02/1243368.aspx

The Media's incuriousity about Duley's sworn testimony is very revealing, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. The Court's lack of curiousity shocked me.
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 12:02 PM by sfexpat2000
The judge didn't ask a single question when these statements were made and went into the record. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. In other words, a bluff.
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 10:08 AM by screembloodymurder
So, why close the case? We have no real evidence ... case closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. I listened to the NPR story this morning while picking blueberries.
The portion of the story that included an interview with Ivins' older brother was downright creepy. Older brother had not talked to Ivins for over 20 years. He kept repeating that he was much "stronger" than Ivins and another brother.

Substitute an "a" for the "o" in stronger, and you would be closer to the truth.

Much closer than the corporate media is on this story.

Move along now. Nothing to see here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazyriver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. He did sound like a kook. He mocked his brothers for
being smarter and said they thought of themselves as "ohm-ni-pit-ent" as he fumbled to pronounce the word. It sounded like he was reading parts of his answers from a script with someone silently "coaching" him through it. I found that whole interview kind of creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Older brother said he "didn't crumble like the Wall of Jericho tumbling down"
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 10:55 AM by Idealist Hippie
when FBI asked questions about early family life. WTF???

What an exceedingly strange interview that was -- the guy sounded just so nutso-batso I'm surprised NPR even ran the interview (I would love to hear the parts that ended up on the cutting room floor -- would expect experiences with alien probings and ability to dowse buried treasure and streaming Sermon On The Mount on his fillings).

"Are you sorry he's dead?"

"NO!"

"Creepy" doesn't begin to describe that interview.

Edit: Link to NPR interview:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=93250745

Can read or listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. That's what I thought, too. He said Ivins thought he was omnipotent
but the brother is the one that seems to have a problem with a sense of omnipotence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. I heard the older brother too.
That was very creepy and it literally ticked me off how he had no feelings whatsoever for his brother's supposedly suicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. Geez, has our intelligence agencies not been paying attention to how
quickly information gets passed along on the internet? By the end of the week, we'll figure out who the culprit was without their help, but we certainly won't trust their opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. they need to investigate the "ther i pist's" (she misspelled her own profession) letter
it is a HUGE phony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Or, it was done by a fairly naive person being manipulated
by FBI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. The FBI needs to release their evidence NOW
This is a public matter of great concern. Since Dr. Ivins is no longer in - ahem - legal jeopardy, the FBI must release the details of their case against him immediately. They have smeared this man's name and they must now show on what basis they are making these claims. The man is dead, for chrissakes. If they have no case of any value, then the Ivins' family should have recourse to sue the government for tortious conduct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
15. Remember Mc Veigh?
Edited on Mon Aug-04-08 10:56 AM by TWiley
His case was re-opened by the Bushtapo shortly after seizing power in the CIA's 2000 Florida election coup. Rove, Ashcroft, and Cheney had to purge ... oops .... I mean "review" the evidence to be sure he got a fair trial.

I am not suprised the absolutely need to close the book on this one before leaving office. In a way, I do wish Bill Clinton was going to be roaming the hallways on capital hill. I believe he would unearth lots of things because he would know where to look
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
22. Not that Bob Considine continues to label Jean Duley a psychotherapist (where are the journalistic
standards)???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
26. Killed himself, right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC