Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Spector (R-PA) against Telecom Immunity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DWilliamsamh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 11:03 AM
Original message
Sen. Spector (R-PA) against Telecom Immunity
I just got off the phone with Senator Spector's office. A gentleman by the name of Samuel said the Senator thinks the immunity clause should be stripped out of the FISA bill. He plans on offering his own amendment to do just that. Of course he couldn't just support the Feingold/Lahey/Dodd amendment, but he is against immunity. We'll see how he votes though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. We'll see what the good senator proposes in its place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. He and Feingold were speaking about it on the Senate floor about 10 minutes ago
Spector looks terrible by the way, losing his hair again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. he seems to always be against something before he votes for it
my bet is when it comes down to the nut cut'en he'll vote for immunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWilliamsamh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I know he has that kind of history
Which is why I said, we'll see how he votes. But speaking against it is better than speaking in favor of immunity. And he does command a certain level of respect in the senate... even if his voice only gives cover to some more junior members, it could be a good thing.

I know Spector is no maverick, but on this he's better than Reid and the rest of the so called Democratic leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. well at least with one bullet I know he'll always say what I want to hear him say
but vote the other way, most times. I agree with what you said I was just making a comment about his track record

Our Dem leadership is all but none existent at the present time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds Like He Wants A Full Briefing
Sounds like another punt, but we'll see if Magic Bullet Arlen gets his leashed yanked at lunch and does his usual fold.

He is calling for a full brieifing of all Senators on the program before a vote...so far only 30 have gotten that briefing.

Rockafeller looks scared shit. He's so damn compromised in this mess...his tenure on Intel has been a disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Spector got up while Rockefeller was speaking (JR is for immunity)
Spector said I understand that 70 Senators will not be briefed on the program, and asks how they can grant immunity when they don't know what they are granting immunity for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. I remember this show from before
Spector, McCain and one other repub "Standing against torture"...and then folding.

It was a nice song and dance with a disappointing ending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Last time around
he proposed an amendment where the government would take the place of the telecoms in the suits, as a way to nullify the argument that the telecoms will be financially destroyed by the suits. To me it seemed to make perfect sense, but I am no lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. a thread was started earlier on this if you guys want to join us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC