Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What We Need Is an F-Word Revolution, by Antonia Zerbisias

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 07:00 AM
Original message
What We Need Is an F-Word Revolution, by Antonia Zerbisias
What We Need Is an F-Word Revolution
by Antonia Zerbisias

He’s the boss, she’s a bitch. He’s independent, she’s pathetic. He’s childless, she’s selfish. He’s a Romeo, she’s a stalker. He’s angry, she’s PMSing.

These are just some of the gender inequities in Jessica Valenti’s new book, He’s a Stud, She’s a Slut and 49 Other Double Standards Every Woman Should Know.

Pay close attention to how men and women are commonly characterized — come on down, Hillary Clinton! — and you can’t miss the so-ingrained-most-can’t-even-hear-them-any-more slurs against women.

...The conservative movement and the backlash against feminism have been extremely successful and smart in labelling feminism with all these ridiculous stereotypes that really serve a specific and strategic purpose. If young women believe that feminism is for man-haters, is uncool, is ugly, then why would they ever want to identify with it?”

Why indeed?

Continued:
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/06/25/9867/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. We don't say 'that's awfully 'white' of you' any more. Why compliment women by giving them 'balls'?
Our language is very sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Boys are still conditioned to chastise their peers: "Don't be such a GIRL!"
...based on this type of jingoistic mindset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. and I thought it was "girly men" as the Governor of California once proclaimed.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Six of one, half a dozen of the other. Winning "hearts and minds" requires early indoctrination
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLib at work Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. When you have some women themselves, of the conservative ilk, of course, actually out there
preaching this shit themselves, you know that there has been a really strong effort to keep women shoeless, pregnant and in the kitchen.

Old, white men are so terrified of women that if it were not so harmful to us, it might be comical.

Virtually every form of fundamentalist religion has at it core, rules to keep women subjugated. The rise of these belief systems, including here in the US, is not a threat to be taken lightly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Agreed. Not to mention the newer forms of "shoeless, pregnant and in the kitchen," so to speak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. These threads on sexism really drop like stones, don't they? Not much interest. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. There was another sourcing the same article called "BITCH," and it naturally was very active...
...by comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. 14 responses doesn't measure up to "very active" on DU. Nice try. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Why get shitty with me over it? ...I stated "active by comparison," which it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Compared to this thread? Threads on sexism just die on DU. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. The "Women Dropping Out of Science Careers" addresses the same topic, yet has over 100 responses
But then, feminism is the backdrop of the careerism/professionalism of that thread, which will attract many more opinions that just discussing feminism itself.

I'm not disagreeing with you...just wondered why you took a snide tone with me over the thread's lack of views/responses when I'm the one who posted/sourced it to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Indeed. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedleyMisty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've been doing some reading lately
Edited on Thu Jun-26-08 04:33 PM by sleebarker
about the women in countries ruled by militias - like how they're gang raped and then shot in the vagina.

I really do not feel safe having ovaries. And sexism is not a "pet issue", nor is half of the species a "special interest group".

To explain - just theorizing a bit on why there's not much interest in it around here.

As for my response to the actual article - right on. I'll have to check out the blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. The first division of our species is gender, not race.
We are a complementary species, not competitive, but for some reason that scares lots of men. I wonder if their fear comes from the fact that they can never be certain that their offspring is really their offspring? (Well, short of DNA testing, that is.)

Sometime I think it's gotten worse as technology advances. With a well stocked sperm bank we could survive much easier without them than they could without us. On the other hand, if technology creates a viable artificial womb, I'm certain things would get much worse for women.

I'm into science fiction, so many of my ideas are colored by that. A couple of good sci fi novels that deal with feminism are The Gate to Woman's Country, The Lefthand of Darkness, and The Handmaid's Tale. Completely different types of stories, but they all raised my awareness of feminism. The Handmaid's Tale is quite disturbing & I see many similarities between it & current times.

There is a feminist forum on DU. Do you ever post there? I used to visit it regularly & then lost my settings & only thought of it as I wrote this post.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=341

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good article! Alas, I think it will take a long time to undo what the right wing
has done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. It's not just the right wing. Sexism serves the interests of a lot of people.
Even here on DU, a "progressive" website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Absolutely. And it's pervasive in many different cultures.
It's so much a part of our own culture that it will be very difficult to eradicate, especially when there are so many people who don't want to see a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. absolutely necessary
:kick: it's good to know young women are reclaiming the word. like everyone else, women regressed during the rw backlash. like someone else mention in this thread, feminism is about half the world's human population, not "special interests" or other dismissive terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. "‘I’m-not-a-feminist-but’ syndrome"
true true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. Domination began again under Raygun
after the women's rights movement in the 70's. Women again were depicted as bimbos in popular films, and amnesia set in to mask the issues and the progress. The clock was turned back. Fascism depends upon women to go along with the program.
Unfortunately there are too many women who have been indoctrinated into powerlessness, reproducing themselves, and belittling women who ask of them to question their subservience and self image.
It seems that women must start over again, from the beginning, educating and exposing atrocities, differences in salary for the same work, and especially by emulating strength, empowerment and confidence.
Then perhaps women will once again learn their true power, that without consent, domination becomes impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. Too late for an R but here's a K! Great article, thanks. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC