Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I feel HORRIBLE for Tim and his family. Just don't call him objective...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Nightjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:31 PM
Original message
I feel HORRIBLE for Tim and his family. Just don't call him objective...
I truly feel heartbroken for Tim Russert and his family.
Ten years ago my dad died of a heart attack at the young age of 52 ... right after he bought a home in Florida where he would retire in 3 months. I know the horrible shock to family and friends and I have already said a prayer in support of a good, talented, man whose life ended way too quickly.

But please in remembering Tim don't pretend he was objective.
From the book True Lies here is an an excerpt about the 2000 (s)election.

"At one point in the evening, Gore explains, Russert approached the candidates. As Gore was closest to him, Russert respectfully shook his hand and then moved on to Bush. Thinking that Gore had turned away, Russert shook Bush’s hand and, mischievously, turned over his jacket lapel to reveal a Bush campaign pin hidden under the fold."


Warning. This is a harsh article from two years ago. I wasn't even going to post this until I saw multiple "he was such a objective reporter" lines here.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Time%20for%20change/31
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is it really that important that you prove your point on the day he died?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Exactly
Not good to speak ill of the dead at least until some time has passed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. My condolences to the family
but let's not pretend he was on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
46. tell me, to the minute, when it becomes appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
58. Okay, I'll give him until . . .
. . . 9:35 Eastern Time.

Is that enough time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
53. Now is the time when we're discussing him.
It may seem harsh to write anything negative about a celebrity right after he died, but the good and the bad belongs in the discussion when it's happening, which is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are we really going to stomp on the man's grave? He DIED - who cares if he votes republican???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
59. I don't think the OP cares that he voted repuke
he cared that otherwise seemingly sane DUers seem to think Russert was an objective journalist, which is so far from the truth that someone needed to say something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. zomg i don't think anyone is, christ people he just died, can this stuff wait for like 12 hours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't feel he was objective at all. Especially evil toward Gore.
I stopped watching anything he was on because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Give it time, please. Good journalists always piss someone off and I think he did on both sides.
Just a little respect, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. "good journalist"? He died fairly young, but doing so doesn't make him something that he wasn't in
life.

Journalism is pretty much dead in this country. What we've got is the Corporate Propaganda Ministry, aka McPravda. Thank Jeebus for the blogosphere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. That's a good point
I got very angry at Amy Goodman (who is worshipped by DU) when she grilled Bill Clinton on an Election Day interview in 2000. But I still think she is an outstanding journalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm not going to call him anything right now.
My sympathies to his friends and family. It's horrible to lose someone suddenly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you. He died too young, but that doesn't make him "objective" OR a "journalist"

This concept that we're supposed to think that everyone becomes a saint at the moment of death is really bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Agreed. You were what you were and when you die there's no chance left to change it.
How many people died today at age 58? Don't know the number, but it's probably a lot. What makes this guy so special?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
45. exactly - nothing makes him so special. This bizarre concept that anything that happens to a
"celebrity" is a brazillion times more important than things that happen to everyone else is mind-boggling. and disheartening. and makes people seem really stoopid. Like sheep. or lemmings. :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. I joined DU several years ago because of posters like you
Truth always comes first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. That's a cop-out, and you know it.
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 04:06 PM by Selatius
Tim Russert may be a lot of things, but just because you dangle his family in front of people doesn't mean the truth can be suspended. If you can't feel for someone's family after someone dies without recognizing the truth of that person's actions, then you truly are lost both for your sake and the sake of that family. I was unimpressed when they rewrote Reagan's history to make him appear bigger, and I will remain unimpressed when people will do it with Tim Russert.

By no means do I glorify his death, nor would I tolerate anyone who accuses me of doing so, but let the truth be said that a lot of people died in the sands of Iraq, and those people had families as well. Russert isn't the only person to blame for the media failing to ask questions in the run-up to the 2003 invasion, but he was one of many who didn't ask truly hard-hitting questions when they needed to be asked because the lives of so many depended on them.

If people are saying Tim Russert was objective, I've got 4000+ American grave plots to sell them and over a million Iraqi plots.

If a person dies, give him the honor of the truth and nothing but the god-honest truth both what he did for Iraq and for what he did for Fitzgerald's investigation. Don't paste over his record with dishonorable aggrandizing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
56. Great post n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
61. Indeed.
Condolences to his family.

GEEZ - Olbermann just started the "Countdown" show (sort of), and he looks TERRIBLE!!! As though he's spent a LOT of time back in the back, seriously choked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
62. What a petty post. A true loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Same here
The truth is important and should not be forgot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
40. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Is a journalist-poseur worse than an upfront right wing mouthpiece?
"Today's essay question, class"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
54. fantastic post, TBA!
wish we could recommend individual posts.
If you don't mind, I've quoted it in some other threads - with proper attribution, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #54
72. "This post, too"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
60. I heard it said once that a KKK member in a sheet is better than one in a suit
At least you know where you stand with the one in the sheet.

A poseur is worse than an upfront mouthpiece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. I'll never forget his testimony under oath that he was always off the record
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 03:52 PM by librechik
with the truly powerful. In other words the default with Tim was to keep their secrets and stiff the public.

Whatever he was once, Tim had lost his way as a journalist, and acted more like a subsidiary White House flack. He was tough--especially on wayward liberals who threatened the military indistrial complex, his boss.

I'm sorry he died so young, and I have sympathy for his family--they must be crushed.

May he rest in peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
33. Damn straight. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. Duplicate. Self-delete.
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 04:53 PM by tom_paine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Also worked for Moynihan and Cuomo

In 1976, he worked on the Senate campaign of Daniel Patrick Moynihan, D-N.Y., and in 1982, he worked on Mario Cuomo’s campaign for governor of New York.

Daniel Moynihan is one of my all time favorites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. he was mouthpiece with an agenda. he wasn't really even a 'journalist' anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
44. If he met the standard for what passes for a journalist around Democratic Underground,
we're in worse trouble than I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm sorry, but that little tall tale just sounds, well, um, let's see FALSE
That's one of those little anecdotes that's just a little too "perfect".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
68. Are you calling the OP a liar?
or are you calling Al Gore a liar, since he's the one who related the incident to the author of the book being quoted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. Nobody worth their fucking shit would claim he was objective, and shame on anyone who does.
The man is dead. Let him have his peace from false lies that he was objective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. That's both wrong and wrong.
Posts like this make me ashamed of DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. Your timing sucks. Bigtime.
Tacky post. :thumbsdown:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. Amen
It has been real hard not to say what I really think. You've said (part of) what I've been thinking and you've done it more politely than I can.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Is this really necessary - today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
47. when does it become acceptable?
a day?

a month?

a year?

long enough for all the encomia to blur the reality of his function as a cog in the GE/MIC/Intel wheel?

it's NOT going to be mentioned in the M$M that he was CHOSEN by Cheney's gang as the TOP OPTION in getting the word out, because "we control the message a little bit more"

Remember Cathie Martin's testimony at the Libby trial?
Martin replaced Mary Matalin in Cheney's office


As Martin rated their options, putting Cheney on "Meet the Press," NBC's Sunday morning talk show, "is our best format." Cheney was their best person for the show and "we control the message a little bit more," according to Martin.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/0...



Top levels of the Bush administration decided that CIA Director George Tenet would issue a statement taking the blame for allowing Bush to mention the Niger story. Cheney and Libby worried Tenet would not go far enough to distance the vice president from the affair.


Libby asked Martin to map a media strategy in case Tenet fell short.


A Harvard law school graduate, Martin had succeeded legendary Republican operative Mary Matalin as Cheney's political and public affairs assistant. Matalin had brought Martin to Cheney's office as her deputy and trained her.


Martin offered these options in order:


Put Cheney on "Meet the Press."


Leak an exclusive version to a selected reporter or the weekly news magazines.


Have national security adviser Condoleezza Rice or Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld hold a news conference.


_Persuade a third party or columnist to write an opinion piece that would appear in newspapers on the page opposite the editorials.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirmensMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. I can't believe
you feel the need to post this so soon after his death. And I can't believe there are 5 DUers who think it's worthy of the Greatest Page. :puke:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
26. He'll never have the chance to write write that novel, the one about the fearless reporter ...
... who stands up to the administration. You know -- fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. LOL
That's it. That's exactly it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Maybe Colbert could take his place
there couldn't be that much justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
30. Oh, he was as objective as it's possible to be alright, and what biases he showed were to the left.
What *YOU* mean when you say he wasn't "objective" is: "he didn't agree with me 100% of the time on every possible subject under the sun, and didn't talk about issues that were important to me and me only every single time he went on TV."

And I don't buy a word from your "article," either, BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. You must be new to Democratic politics
If you had paid close attention the last dozen years or so, you would understand the OP's sentiments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. You must be new to the English language - try reading my reply again. This time have your tutor on
hand to lend assistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #39
48. biases were toward the left??????
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 05:22 PM by Gabi Hayes
please, try breathing oxygen for awhile

perhaps your senses will return

and call us when you get back from the Oort Cloud

here's just ONE example that might affect your delusional thinking:

Top levels of the Bush administration decided that CIA Director George Tenet would issue a statement taking the blame for allowing Bush to mention the Niger story. Cheney and Libby worried Tenet would not go far enough to distance the vice president from the affair.


Libby asked {Cathie} Martin to map a media strategy in case Tenet fell short.


A Harvard law school graduate, Martin had succeeded legendary Republican operative Mary Matalin as Cheney's political and public affairs assistant. Matalin had brought Martin to Cheney's office as her deputy and trained her.


Martin offered these options in order:


_Put Cheney on "Meet the Press."


_Leak an exclusive version to a selected reporter or the weekly news magazines.


_Have national security adviser Condoleezza Rice or Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld hold a news conference.


_Persuade a third party or columnist to write an opinion piece that would appear in newspapers on the page opposite the editorials.......


......As Martin rated their options, ''putting Cheney on "Meet the Press," NBC's Sunday morning talk show, "is our best format." Cheney was their best person for the show and "we control the message a little bit more," according to Martin.


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/01/27/national/w093216S19.DTL&hw=

this is from Libby's TRIAL. you can choose to believe it, or not. have fun, though, in your alternate universe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. thanks for the newspaper link
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 05:27 PM by TheBorealAvenger
Did Cheney go on MTP w/ Russert? I lost track
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #39
49. You mind yourself...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #39
50. Evidence based politics
I can't seem to recall any evidence in the last dozen years or so to indicate Russert was "left leaning".

Can you provide some concrete examples?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kickin_Donkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
32. I don't get the canonization of this MSM TV personality ...
He was a shill for General Electric and Jack Welch. Good riddance.

For those who want to blubber all over themselves about Russert's passing, there are plenty of other threads for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. "Good riddance"????? You need a heart. Love the masses - but hate the individuals you don't like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. how do you get "hate" from "good riddance"?
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 05:01 PM by FarceOfNature
I didn't cry when Reagan died either. Did you? Do you have some sort of political purity test for who gets your tears? My test is whether or not i KNEW them and CARED about them.
My grandpa was a really hardcore conservative but a gentle man. I cried for days when he died. I felt "good riddance" when Reagan died and with Russert, I feel "huh, sucks for his family".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Whatever -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #32
64. "Good riddance" goes a bit far for me
... but there will be much sad irony over the next week(s) as media personalities grieve over the loss of their coworker and colleague, to a degree not shown for the thousands of US, Iraqi and other casualties for which they are all partly responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
41. K & R. One of the finest GE employees ev-ah. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
52. Amen
I remember an interview he did with Laura Bush on the hardships of sending American troops to war. It was the phoniest, most dishonest piece of journalism one could think of. Russert gave her softball questions and let her lie through her teeth. When it was all over he said, "Thank you for a very uplifting conversation." Yeah, don't we all feel better now? Laura finds it difficult to send young men to their deaths because of her husband's lies. Boy, that's inspiring. It was even more pathetic than much of the stuff I've seen on Fox.

I hold Tim Russert in the same vein that I do every other media whore that lied us into this war. Now if bringing these kinds of things up means I'm pissing on the man's grave, then so be it. He died. Too young by most people's standards. Ain't that a bitch? Sorry it happened and all that, but I didn't kill him. And I still remember his phony reporting that contributed to the deaths of hundreds of thousands. So the last thing in the world I really feel like doing now is mourning. But at the same time, I don't feel like dancing either. The only thing I really feel is the longing for some real journalists to take over the American media. Russert wasn't one of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
55. i think on the day he dies, we shouldn't call him anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiaasenrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
57. You (and the authors of that book) are not interested in objectivity anyway.
That's obvious from the silly journal entry you posted. Essentially it advocates for treating others with no objectivity.

Russert did a fine job and your journal shows that you have very little understanding of how journalism works. You prefer advocacy.

Not that you care, but your ridiculous and unfounded attacks on the day of his death warrant the rare ignore. Buh-bye. :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
63. A couple excerpts from Tim Russert's career ...
One an excerpt of Russert from Bill Moyers' "Buying the War" program, from a segment prefacing Bill Moyers discussing with Walter Pincus what happened to objective journalism ....So, I take issue with the Reagan-like deification and praise that will be heaped upon Tim Russert's *professional*, "journalistic" legacy, but that doesn't take anything away from Russert the human, husband, father or son. I do not question his love of his family, his coworkers, country or humanity.

But Russert also left me with hope, hope that maybe someone will take heed of what he said during last week's MSNBC coverage of the final night of Democratic primaries, in this excerpt from the transcript...
    RUSSERT: I just wanted to make one quick comment because I have been thinking a lot about the speeches we heard and what presidential elections can mean to a country. Everybody has hopes and dreams and aspirations about how we see our country and how we see our world. And I do think that John McCain and Barack Obama are really going to paint very different pictures. We saw the beginning of that tonight. And it's going to be really extraordinary for us as a country, as a people, to have this chance to listen to this. And when I heard Obama begin to talk in these patriotic themes about how he envisioned the country and the world, I automatically called up John McCain saying, we always have to be conscious and aware of something beyond ourselves, something more important than ourselves. We have two very idealistic men. We have two very patriotic men. But we have men with very, very different senses of what our country should be in the surrounding world. And if we can have an election with huge differences on big issues, it will be so important for our country and our democracy and it can really add even more to this already historic election.

Here's hoping we can have an election -- and election coverage -- of which this Tim Russert would be proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionToday Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
65. Pretty Pathetic that Russert is being given zombie journo-cred from so-called liberals
Edited on Sat Jun-14-08 12:07 AM by RevolutionToday
He was horrible to your side and you can't see it? Really? I know that liberalism is what passes for the left here, but you all should at least be able to see when someone spits in your face every week on that silly 'gotcha' show with the stupid name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
66. More dancing on the graves of the dead
by the OP as well as several other people in this thread. It's disgusting and sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #66
69. what's sad is so that many here lack the critical thinking skills required to realize
that criticizing someone who has died does NOT equal "grave dancing". And sad that many think that dying means you should be elevated to sainthood, facts be damned.

It's also sad that so few are aware of the damage inflicted on our country (and the world) by the US Corporate Media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
67. DUers did it for Bill Buckley, they'll do it for Ollie f*ing North
Edited on Sat Jun-14-08 12:38 AM by MisterP
actual facts will be called the deepest shame and embarrassment, and they'll accuse anyone repeating them of costing us elections, etc., etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
70. He was impartial. Haven't we learned our lesson about the silliness of lapel pins? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
71. I feel
sorry for his family, but the man should have gone for regular physicals. He looked like a tick ready to pop.

Makes the case for early detection and screening for heart problems. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #71
73. He did. If you didn't see the interview on MSNBC with his physician, you should
He had high blood pressure, but it was well controlled with medication. They knew he had coronary artery disase, but again, it was well controlled with medication. That is per Russert's physician.

The cause of death was not a heart attack, it was a blood clot or a thrombosis. Russert had just returned from Italy the day before. Flying on a long flight can cause a blood clot if you don't get up and move around enough during the flight. It happens, and most times it is out of the blue.

Your post is simply wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #73
75. Oh geez
:eyes:

You're a jerk too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
74. He used to work for Moynihan, dem from NY
The right wing thinks he is a flaming liberal, some on DU think that he was a neocon. His political views may have changed over the years, but I think he tried to be objective. Whether he succeeded or not may be another story. The man simply loved politics.

You are entitled to your views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC