Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California Court Weakens Ban on Unmarked Traffic Police

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 04:56 PM
Original message
California Court Weakens Ban on Unmarked Traffic Police
California Court Weakens Ban on Unmarked Traffic Police
California appeals court ruling allows unmarked police cars to make traffic stops for any offense other than speeding.

M. Kathleen ButzAn appellate court last Thursday weakened a ban on using unmarked cars to issue traffic citations that had stood for nearly eighty-five years. A three-judge panel of the California Court of Appeal for the Third District made the change in the case of Paul Dyer, a man accused of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI).

Around midnight on February 9, 2006, Placer County Sheriff's Sergeant Jess Phariss was patrolling Highway 267 in an unmarked police car. Phariss grew suspicious when he saw the Jeep Cherokee belonging to Dyer driving slowly. He followed the Jeep and claimed that it crossed the highway's center line several times. Phariss initiated a traffic stop, noted signs of intoxication and had a second Sheriff's Deputy who had been called to the scene administer sobriety tests. A handheld breath testing device produced a reading of 0.07 -- under the legal limit -- for Dyer. Phariss deemed this "inconclusive" and proceeded to arrest the man anyway. A second breathalyzer test administered at 1:07am indicated a 0.11 reading -- above the legal limit. It is possible for such readings to increase over time as alcohol is absorbed into the bloodstream.

A trial court judge threw out the DUI conviction as proceeding from an unlawful arrest and ordered the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to overturn the agency-imposed driver's license suspension. The DMV appealed the court ruling.

Since 1923, California has outlawed the police tactics upon which many other states rely to conduct speed traps. One key provision of this statute prohibits traffic police from using any vehicle not distinctively marked. In most cases, this means the traditional black and white design. In her ruling last week, Justice M. Kathleen Butz cited a 1991 decision explaining the legislature was "motivated by a desire to eliminate clandestine methods of traffic enforcement designed to augment local revenues through exorbitant fines."

In this case, the three-judge panel ruled that because the law only applies to traffic police, it did not apply to Phariss who played only a "supervisory" role. The second officer who had been called to the scene made the actual arrest. Moreover, the justices refused to apply the speed trap law to other common traffic offenses.

http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/23/2390.asp

Not those out there who get pulled over and get a breathalyzer test - their own machines were in contradiction :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Only bad thing with unmarked cars is you get impersonators who want to ...
Edited on Mon May-26-08 05:37 PM by BlueJazz
...do serious harm...(especially to Women)

Boy...Hard call but I would ban unmarked cars...
Too many Nuts out there who want to "Play Cop"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Best reply yet to this thread
Of course, it is the only one so far... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I would never pull over for an unmarked car n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC