Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The appeals court decision re the Texas raid was predictable and there's a big fat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:25 PM
Original message
The appeals court decision re the Texas raid was predictable and there's a big fat
precedent. I know quite a bit about it because I was tangentially involved in the raid. Here's an exerpt about the raid on what was then the Northeast Kingdom Community Church and is now called The Twelve Tribes:

<snip>

"At the same time, news of the sometimes alarming behavior of religious cults frightened residents. For some, the Northeast Kingdom Community Church looked unnervingly like the People's Temple, whose nearly 800 members committed mass suicide in Jonestown, Guyana, in 1978.

By 1984, the chorus of concerns about child abuse, combined with a number of highly publicized complaints filed against church elders, brought the state to a watershed. Then-Gov. Richard Snelling found himself in a fix. After days and days of debate, Snelling approved the raid.

"He was uncomfortable with it," said the late-governor's wife, Barbara Snelling, "but he felt it was extremely important that the state find out if the children were being abused. It is a painful memory, but I think my husband did the right thing."

Armed with a search warrant issued by Judge Joseph J. Wolchik, 140 social workers and state troopers converged on Island Pond early June 22 and took 112 children into custody.

But because the search warrant didn't give the state the subsequent right to detain the children, a second court hearing was necessary, with Judge Frank Mahady presiding. Mahady looked at the state's evidence, including its inability to name individual cases of child abuse, and ruled the raid unconstitutional. The children went home and, eventually, the state's case was dropped."

<snip>

You can bet your life that the Appeals Ct in the Texas case poured over this case and over Judge Mahady's decision. I think it was the right decision in 1984 in VT and I think it's the right decision now. And yes, they were abusing the kids in Island Pond.

http://www.nasw.org/users/nbazilchuk/Articles/islandpond.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. It sure is the right decision
That alleged phone call from a caller who was never found was about as bad a basis for that whole search and seizure as one can imagine. There's freedom of religion for Catholic priests who molest kids, but an odd-looking and marginal group who want to worship in their own way get raided.

If we don't protect the oddballs, we can't protect anyone. The matter of child abuse has to be handled in a whole different way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep.
There's protocols and procedures to follow in cases of allegations of child abuse. Frank Mahady, bless his soul, was a fantastic and brilliant jurist. His decision in the case is well worth reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here's a link
The decision's long, but, I think, well worth reading. Thanks for the suggestion.

http://www.twelvetribes.com/controversies/mahady-opinion.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I haven't read it in years. Thanks for posting the link.
Frank Mahady was a brilliant man and he could write too. Do you think the appeals court In TX referenced this case? It seems to me it would be kind of strange if they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Of course they did,
even if it's not cited in their opinion. I haven't seen a copy of that opinion online yet, but it's possible someone just took judicial notice of it without citing it.

When it's up, I'll try to post a link here. Thanks for bringing up a very significant matter that was, I think, given short shrift by the media in favor of sensationalism. In the end, it was a matter of religious freedom, and the Texas authorities tried to make it a child abuse issue - without any evidence.

Texas, where the Waco abomination took place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. it's frightening to see how many people advocate trashing the
Constitution- but I understand it. I originally supported the Island Pond raid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You were there?
One of the angry townfolk, running with flaming torches, calling for The Monster to be destroyed?

I'm kidding, but I'm also curious about any first-hand knowledge of things like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No. I was one of the
social workers. And I know the State's attny involved and the district head of SRS very well. Very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC