Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clint Eastwood = Racist?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SavageDem Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:50 PM
Original message
Clint Eastwood = Racist?
Spike Lee points out that Eastwood's last two Iwo Jima films (Letters from Iwo Jima and Flags of our Fathers) had no black soldiers portrayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, for shit's sake...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
70. ...and the first response is the best one (except I'd have said "oh, for fuck's sake")...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, considering the armed forces were segregated at the time that isn't surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavageDem Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I wasn't making the judgment...
...just asking the question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
75. But there were 900 African-American Marines there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Neither did Spielberg in Saving Private Ryan n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plasticsundance Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. This is what happens to a mind that goes to too many New York Knicks games.
or, another example of the Decline of the West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
40. Oswald Spengler?
Jesus, which side do YOU root for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. They did, however, represent native Americans and Japanese as real people instead of stereotypes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plasticsundance Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. What team did they root for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavageDem Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Glad to hear it.
Haven't seen either movie yet, but have wanted to. Have always enjoyed Eastwood films (outside of banal Every Which Way... series). Now finding internal conflict knowing that he's a McCain supporter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
64. If you can, watch them back to back. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mach2 Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. The story reports Lee is making a movie with all black people.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. ...
:spray:

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Literacy is fun!
The story says Lee's making a film about a segregated division.

Not an all black film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mach2 Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Here is a direct quote from the story.
"Lee — whose next film is this fall's "Miracle at St. Anna," the story of an all-black U.S. division fighting in Italy during the war"

You seem to be making a distinction without a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Here's a direct quote from a semi literate.
"making a movie with all black people."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mach2 Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. I didn't insult you...why are you insulting me?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. If you're going to play dumb...
it's going to come back to haunt you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. All black people?
It's a story about an "all black division". Probably nothing you will be interested in seeing.
Lee — whose next film is this fall's "Miracle at St. Anna," the story of an all-black U.S. division fighting in Italy during the war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mach2 Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Sorry, I should have said "division."
That is apparently a totally different thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Well, yeah.
It is a different thing.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #29
53. Do you understand...
the difference between a story about a black division fighting in WWII, and an 'all black movie'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Apparently some black WWII veterans are upset too.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/oct/21/usa.filmnews

How uppity of them. Why won't they just shut up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. thanks for the perspective...
I can't imagine why soldiers who served in WWII would be upset at being written out of their own history. A couple of extras were all it would have taken. Too much to ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavageDem Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Ooooh, that's good info!
Thanks for that reference. That adds some meat to the discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. The good news is...
in these films the black guy didn't die
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. That's a stretch - Come up with somethig concret
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. OK
"Melton McLaurin, author of the forthcoming The Marines of Montford Point and an accompanying documentary to be released in February, says that there were hundreds of black soldiers on Iwo Jima from the first day of the 35-day battle. Although most of the black marine units were assigned ammunition and supply roles, the chaos of the landing soon undermined the battle plan.

"When they first hit the beach the resistance was so fierce that they weren't shifting ammunition, they were firing their rifles," said Dr McLaurin.

The failure to transfer the active role played by African-Americans at Iwo Jima to the big screen does not surprise him. "One of the marines I interviewed said that the people who were filming newsreel footage on Iwo Jima deliberately turned their cameras away when black folks came by. Blacks are not surprised at all when they see movies set where black troops were engaged and never show on the screen. I would like to say that it was from ignorance but anybody can do research and come up with books about African-Americans in world war two. I think it has to do with box office and what producers of movies think Americans really want to see.""

See link above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. I don't dissagree that there were Black at Iwo - and I don't know if Eastwood is a raceist
ANd I"m not defending him - but I still don't get how not having black actors in that movie equates to Eastwood being a racist.

He may well be - but this dosen't do it for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. Morgan Freeman wasn't complaining of being Clint's co-star in
Unforgiven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. He won best supporting actor in Eastwood's Million Dollar Baby n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. It would have been nice of Clint
to portray reality in his films. There were black marines fighting and dying on Iwo Jima.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. Everything is considered racist this year.
:eyes:

Especially if you don't support Obama and think he's a corporatist shill like most the rest of em in D.C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavageDem Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. It's a difficult balance.
There is no doubt - among thoughtful, rational people - that racism is still very much alive and well in the United States. But I don't want to be reactionary and assign every negative action a racist motive. Perhaps my subject line was a bit inflammatory, as I really was not implying that I automatically assumed Eastwood to be a racist. It is curious, however - especially given the supporting info provided in threads above - that black soldiers were not portrayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCappedBandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
52. I'm starting to think the vast majority of people are actually racist
not because of Obama's campaign.. just more life experiences. Just sayin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #52
63. all people are prejudice in one way or another
it is part of our nature. Only maybe about 1/2 of us are racist (my made up statistics). :)

I am always surprised at how many liars, racist, and abusers there are in this world. No matter how old I get, how much I see, or how cynical I get, it always surprises me the extent of it. That is why I am a misanthrope (not a hater as much as a distruster).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reader Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. Armed forces weren't integrated until 1948
So isn't that historically accurate? I know all-black units served in the ETO, but were there any involved in the island-hopping campaigns in the Pacific? Can any military historians clarify this for us?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Historically accurate? No. See link above.
Even a black man involved in that historic flag raising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
58. There was only one Army Negro Division in the Pacific theater of operation
The 93rd Division. It island hopped, moping up after the fighting was complete. The 93rd division was basically used as land based stevedores. Truck driving, moving supplies (can you say ordinance?), and whatnot.

During the First World War the all-black 93rd division, a rag-tag outfit that was initially issued Civil War uniforms, were assigned to French command by General John Pershing during WWI. The French desperately needed fresh troops and Pershing was able to satisfy France's needs by getting rid of his own problem - black soldiers. The 93d Division turned in their American equipment and were issued French rifles, bayonets, helmets, packs, and other equipment of the French soldier. They were then organized, trained, and commanded as a French unit, the first unit in US history to serve under foreign command.

The 93nd division fought as part of the French army, where, ironically, it found acceptance, respect, and glory, eventually winning the Croix de Guerre, only to return to America and find Jim Crow laws alive and well.

Their WWII unit patch was the Adrian helmet, a French helmet.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reader Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #58
69. Damn, that's cool and yet very sad.
Thanks for the history lesson! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nykym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
28. Dear Spike
The story of the battle of Iwo Jima between the United States and Imperial Japan during World War II, as told from the perspective of the Japanese who fought it. So round eye what you say to that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dukkha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
30. acoording to Spike all whitey is racist
get a life your movies suck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
31. And what black units served in the battle for Iwo Jima?
Serious question.

I know that the army was very loathe to have black combat units in Europe - they had problems with having black soldiers killing white soldiers. There were the Tuskegee Airmen, of course, and all kinds of black support companies in Europe. And I understand there were black combat units in the Pacific (it's OK for blacks to kill Asians), but not in the Marines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. The 8th U.S. Marine Corp. Maybe you've heard of them.


See link above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. You mean, this link?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/oct/21/usa.filmnews

A good link bears repeating.

All I can say is 'wow'.

I was a Marine, and I never knew about that. It was, of course, a support company, but I was not even aware they had been there. I had gotten the impression that the only black units that got near combat were Army.

It's good to know I was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
32. Clint Eastwood = Ableist.
Edited on Wed May-21-08 01:18 PM by KamaAina
Million Dollar Baby: Woman acquires disability and promptly kills herself.

Eastwood on the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA):

http://www.inclusiondaily.com/news/access/notification.htm#100200

On Friday, a jury decided that Clint Eastwood was liable for three violations regarding access at his Mission Ranch Inn, but did not order the actor/director to pay any damages to the woman who had sued him.

Diane zum Brunnen, who has multiple sclerosis and uses a wheelchair, claimed that Eastwood's Mission Ranch Inn in Carmel was inaccessible when she and her husband visited in 1996. She was asking for damages and for the court to force Eastwood to make changes to make the hotel more accessible....

Eastwood has portrayed himself as a hero for small business owners who do not adhere to the Americans with Disabilities Act, suggesting they are victims of "renegade lawyers". He has also claimed that people with disabilities are being used by such attorneys who just want a "fistful of dollars".

In May of this year, Eastwood argued before the U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary that businesses should be given a 90-day notice before a discrimination complaint could be filed based on the ADA. Eastwood was defending HR 3590, the proposed "ADA Notification Act", which many disability rights advocates say would severely weaken the law.


Earth to Clint: In some cases, the people with disabilities are the attorneys.

edit: italics; bolding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #32
67. Part of my disability checkups
was to see their Psychiatrist whose office was on the third floor. I had to do three flights of stairs when I was not suppose to do one. Fortunately, she got to see my struggle of making the climb. The government ways are not our ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushmeister0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
34. Why hasn't Dirty Harry done a movie about the cooks on navy ships
back then or all the other demeaning duties the majority of blacks were relegated to back then? Nox office draw, I guess.

Better yet, why doesn't Spike Lee shut the F up and do his oen movie about the Tuskeegee Airmen or the 758th, 761st and 784th tank units who fought with distinction in Europe?

Or the Port Chicago disaster, that would be a good one. In fact, why hasn't anyone done a movie about that?

http://www.rotten.com/library/history/port-chicago/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Is it too much to ask that people read...
before sticking their feet in their mouths?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. He IS doing his own movie about a combat division in Europe.
but you are right - there needs to be a movie about the Port Chicago catastrophe. I remember a made-for-TV movie some years ago featured it - how it prompted a mutiny because the ammunition-handling procedures were not changed after it happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. You may be remembering an episode of 'JAG'
That's the only thing I've ever seen on teevee about Port Chicago — and if I knew of something, I'd watch it.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0613331/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. You know, you may be right.
(I hate getting old - the first to go is NOT the knees.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. Heh... tell me about it
I may be wrong, too. I don't get eleventy skillion channels, so I could've easily missed something.

In fact, a keyword search of IMDb reveals that I am indeed wrong: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0181769/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
42. Maybe he should get revenge by stereotyping all white people in his movies
Oh, wait, he does that already. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mach2 Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Better not criticize him...that's being a racist, yanno...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
44. This Thread = Dumb?
Never heard of Clint's film on Charlie 'Bird' Parker?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094747/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
46. I am glad we (media attention/collective 'we' as a culture) are able to talk about it now.
The more it's discussed, the less likely these omissions will happen in the future. I would imagine there have been complaints in the past but not carried by any media outlet. Good for Mr. Lee for pointing out the omission. Good for the black marines to speak up and be heard.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
48. The real question is
why weren't there any black people in Carmel-by-the-Sea when he was mayor?

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
50. Spike Lee needs to finds something relevant to worry about
Then again, outside of his Katrina documentary Lee's been largely irrelevant as a film maker for some time while Eastwood just seems to get better and better in his twilight years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
55. There were 110,000 U.S. troops in the Battle of Iwo Jima
Everything I can find online says fewer than 900 were black.

If Eastwood maintained historical accuracy, he'd have one black actor in a cast of about 120 — but that would appear as a "token" to many, so he'd be prompted to increase it to maybe half a dozen or so. But then, he'd be misrepresenting the facts.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Quite right. Also, I'd hate to break it to people, but not every movie needs a racial statement
in it. He very thoroughly touched on the mutual racism of both the Americans and the Japanese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
op6203 Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Exactly... AND are they POSITIVE there were no black actors?
While 900 is quite a bit, they still only make up roughly 1% of the soldiers at Iwo Jima. If Clint kept that ratio historically accurate, you'd have to watch very carefully to catch a glimpse of a black soldier.

And how is Spike so sure there wasn't a single black person in this film? I admit, I haven't seen it. But I went to youtube and clicked on "Clint Eastwood - Making Letters of Iwo Jima" Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LF96K8poSE

Look at the still image at the 40 second mark... look right above the word digital in their "digital content" banner. Isn't that a black actor dressed as an American soldier?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
57. Did Clint endorse Hillary or something?
I must have missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. Why would he?
He is, and always has been, a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Well... he is being called a "racist" like the rest of us are....
So I thought maybe he jumped ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #57
72. He didn't endorse her, but...
he did say that he felt sorry for her.

“Everybody’s trying to talk her into folding, but it doesn’t seem like the spirit of Americana,” Eastwood (a McCain supporter) told Politico before heading into the premiere of his drama, Changeling, starring Angelina Jolie, at Cannes Film Festival. “Put yourself in the place of (Clinton). You’ve gone out there and made a thousand speeches, and you’ve shaken a million hands and you’ve been out there working your ass off, and then somebody comes up and says, ‘Why don’t you just drop out of it?’”

The legendary actor/director, who also had a brief stint as Mayor of Carmel, California, said that Clinton could make up what many have called an insurmountable deficit, if Senator Barack Obama trips over himself again.

“I watch Clinton and feel kind of sorry for her and wonder,” ‘What are all these people telling her to run away for?’” Eastwood said in his interview. “She’s showing her strength by hanging in there.”

http://thecelebritycafe.com/features/16025.html

That's the only thing I could come up with on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
61. shit stirring
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
65. Here is yet another way Spike Lee is full of crap
He's squawking that there were no black ACTORS in the film. Yet for every actor in a motion picture, there are
at least 10 people behind the scenes in crew, production staff, studio personnel, and so on. I don't see any quotes
from Lee about people behind the scenes, how many were black, and whether THAT is "acceptable."

From this we can infer that to Spike Lee, it's not about actual opportunity for actual, everyday black people who are
trying to fill their refrigerators and gas tanks TODAY. It's about a slight that, historically, wasn't really a slight.

Idjit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
66. It's certainly typical for white folks to make believe there aren't any black folks...
in their fictional worlds. At least no normal black folks - only cartoonish ones.

But given the blockade we've put on the word "racist", we're probably not allowed to call that racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
68. Dirty Harry had African American, Hispanic, and female police partners
in that series of movies in addition to a Japanese girlfriend in Magnum Force and a black girlfriend and Native American girlfriend in the Eiger Sanction, at points in time when such things were not that common to see depicted in movies. I assume that a major star such as Eastwood had significant creative control over the films he chose to appear in. Clint Eastwood may be a touch conservative for all I know, but he's never struck me as a racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
71. ah, this thread is so predictable
Edited on Wed May-21-08 03:47 PM by fishwax
OP poses the question of Clint Eastwood being racist, and offers a link to a story in which mentions Spike Lee. Bring on the outrage, as defensive posters jump to Eastwood's defense and attack Spike Lee as though he had claimed that Eastwood was a racist: Spike is irrelevant, is a racist himself, is a hack, needs to find something "useful" to complain about, etc. Spike ought to make a movie about the segregated army! Oh, he is? Well then he's just as bad for making a "movie with all black people." :eyes:

Of course, Spike Lee didn't invent this criticism out of thin air--African American veterans (and others) raised the issue when the movies first came out.

I can't imagine why Black veterans who risked their lives at Iwo Jima would want to point out that they were actually there in real life, unlike the widely-acclaimed films--must be because they're "oversensitive" :eyes:

Anyway, Godard said that the best way to perform film criticism is to make another film--sounds like that's what Spike Lee is doing. I find it hard to see what's wrong with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
73. irrelevant probably at this point but, spike was wrong...
"flags of our fathers" was showing on hbo tonight.

there were black actors on screen when the landings were being discussed aboard ship (like 17 minutes into the film.) "the eighth ammo company will land here to resupply..."

was that enough? probably not. but you can't say they weren't there...






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
74. No....The military was segregated at the time.
The first Star Wars movie had no black actors (except for the heard-but-not-seen James Earl Jones), that doesn't make George Lucas a racist. Context of the times and situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. i know...
i was neither defending ancient military policy nor supporting eastwood (who i do like as an actor and as a director, btw...)

i was just pointing out that spike's statements were inaccurate.

there were black actors and their mission portrayed in "flags of our fathers".


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
77. Oh Shit
Why dont we just turn this board over to Freepers? It's useless. They are like Bacteria growing on a culture. If you spot ONE Freeper under your sink, you have a MILLION!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. are you talking to me? n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
79. Liked Million Dollar Baby, but making the German boxer a black ex-prostitute was a little OTT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC