Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could this be Bush's end game?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:41 PM
Original message
Could this be Bush's end game?
His noise about Iran with Brown in tow is weird when combined with other information:



Why is FEMA recruiting CLERGY to preach government propaganda ..."Using PREACHERS to INDOCTINATE and DISARM US?" - Find the answer to this question and ...
answers.yahoo.com.au/answers2/frontend.php/question?qid=20070817010917AACjen4

Next time you are in church and you hear your preacher speaking about what you should do if MARTIAL LAW is declared, you should wonder if your preacher was approached by FEMA in a formerly secret program which is meant to convince Christian conservatives to GIVE UP THEIR GUNS, and do what the government says.

If this doesn't make you wonder what they are up to, I don't know what will.


http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews....
http://www.apostle1.com/daily_news_2006/...
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles...
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/07/1...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwQ7WzxPy...


....... ............

This video is about FEMA camps.

video.aol.com/video-detail/feds-train-clergy-to-quell-dissent-during-martial-law/1518170207 -




............. ......................




Lewis Seiler,Dan Hamburg

Monday, February 4, 2008

"The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist."

- Winston Churchill, Nov. 21, 1943

Since 9/11, and seemingly without the notice of most Americans, the federal government has assumed the authority to institute martial law, arrest a wide swath of dissidents (citizen and noncitizen alike), and detain people without legal or constitutional recourse in the event of "an emergency influx of immigrants in the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs."

Beginning in 1999, the government has entered into a series of single-bid contracts with Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) to build detention camps at undisclosed locations within the United States. The government has also contracted with several companies to build thousands of railcars, some reportedly equipped with shackles, ostensibly to transport detainees.

According to diplomat and author Peter Dale Scott, the KBR contract is part of a Homeland Security plan titled ENDGAME, which sets as its goal the removal of "all removable aliens" and "potential terrorists."

Fraud-busters such as Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, have complained about these contracts, saying that more taxpayer dollars should not go to taxpayer-gouging Halliburton. But the real question is: What kind of "new programs" require the construction and refurbishment of detention facilities in nearly every state of the union with the capacity to house perhaps millions of people?

Sect. 1042 of the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies," gives the executive the power to invoke martial law. For the first time in more than a century, the president is now authorized to use the military in response to "a natural disaster, a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or any other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public order."

The Military Commissions Act of 2006, rammed through Congress just before the 2006 midterm elections, allows for the indefinite imprisonment of anyone who donates money to a charity that turns up on a list of "terrorist" organizations, or who speaks out against the government's policies. The law calls for secret trials for citizens and noncitizens alike.

Also in 2007, the White House quietly issued National Security Presidential Directive 51 (NSPD-51), to ensure "continuity of government" in the event of what the document vaguely calls a "catastrophic emergency." Should the president determine that such an emergency has occurred, he and he alone is empowered to do whatever he deems necessary to ensure "continuity of government." This could include everything from canceling elections to suspending the Constitution to launching a nuclear attack. Congress has yet to hold a single hearing on NSPD-51.

U.S. Rep. Jane Harman, D-Venice (Los Angeles County) has come up with a new way to expand the domestic "war on terror." Her Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 (HR1955), which passed the House by the lopsided vote of 404-6, would set up a commission to "examine and report upon the facts and causes" of so-called violent radicalism and extremist ideology, then make legislative recommendations on combatting it.

According to commentary in the Baltimore Sun, Rep. Harman and her colleagues from both sides of the aisle believe the country faces a native brand of terrorism, and needs a commission with sweeping investigative power to combat it.

A clue as to where Harman's commission might be aiming is the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, a law that labels those who "engage in sit-ins, civil disobedience, trespass, or any other crime in the name of animal rights" as terrorists. Other groups in the crosshairs could be anti-abortion protesters, anti-tax agitators, immigration activists, environmentalists, peace demonstrators, Second Amendment rights supporters ... the list goes on and on. According to author Naomi Wolf, the National Counterterrorism Center holds the names of roughly 775,000 "terror suspects" with the number increasing by 20,000 per month.

What could the government be contemplating that leads it to make contingency plans to detain without recourse millions of its own citizens?

The Constitution does not allow the executive to have unchecked power under any circumstances. The people must not allow the president to use the war on terrorism to rule by fear instead of by law.

Lewis Seiler is the president of Voice of the Environment, Inc. Dan Hamburg, a former congressman, is executive director.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg.../ED5OUPQJ7.DTL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I just read this.
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 09:48 PM by lonestarnot
"Once In Control - Martial Law Will Stay By Ted Twietmeyer 14 Apr 2008 In May 2007, Bush signed executive new orders NSDP51 and HSDP20 to replace REX84. The older order REX84 was an older directive to establish martial law in the event of a national emergency... These two orders established that the White House administration would take over all local governments under a national state of emergency, instead of Homeland Security... Few people know that a secure area inside Wal-Mart headquarters in Bentonville, AR has a sign declaring that secured area belongs to Homeland Security. Wal-Mart will become the food distributor for America under a rationing program." www.citizensforlegitgov.org

http://rense.com/general81/shadowgovt.htm (I don't know much about this site but some of it is fact)

Bush Replaced REX84 With
New Martial Law EO
Once In Control - Martial Law Will Stay
By Ted Twietmeyer
4-14-8

In May 2007, Bush signed executive new orders NSDP51 and HSDP20 to replace REX84. The older order REX84 was an older directive to establish martial law in the event of a national emergency. Everything done in government is done for a reason, and these two new orders are no exception.

These new directives surprised and alarmed many real conservatives and true patriots at the time. These two orders established that the White House administration would take over all local governments under a national state of emergency, instead of Homeland Security.

In May 2007, The Washington Post apparently saw nothing wrong with it and placed the story back on page 13 (a fitting unlucky number for it), according to a CSPAN television interview with well known author and writer Jerome Corsi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They aren't doing all of this for nothing. Methinks this is it.
The US is already a fascist dictatorship, this will be a formality to shut down the institutions and do what the fascist bastard has been doing all along only with "the law" behind him.

I have been preparing to go into the woods, I guess I better hurry it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Strange that only one posted link works...


http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews ....File Not Found
http://www.apostle1.com/daily_news_2006 /...Directory Listing Denied
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles ...Index of /articles (At least this one leads somewhere)
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/07/1 ...Sorry your page was not found ..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwQ7WzxPy ...The URL contained a malformed video ID.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg.../ED5OUPQJ7.DTL...Forbidden

I assume you check your links before you post. All I can say is the shadow government works very fast!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC