Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Colorado Proposes Tough Law on Executive Accountability

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 07:55 PM
Original message
NYT: Colorado Proposes Tough Law on Executive Accountability

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/01/business/01fraud.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&ref=business&adxnnlx=1207023440-uIpjlwMHrDST6ZUgklKXQg&oref=slogin&oref=slogin



Matthew Staver for The New York Times

“We need businesses to survive, but we don’t need criminals running them,” said Lew Ellingson, a former Qwest employee. An insider trading scandal at Qwest damaged its reputation.

By DAN FROSCH
Published: April 1, 2008

DENVER — For 30 years, Lew Ellingson loved being a telephone man.

His job splicing phone cables was one that he says gave him “a true sense of accomplishment,” first for Northwestern Bell, then US West and finally Qwest Communications International.

But by the time Mr. Ellingson retired from Qwest last year at 52, he had grown angry. An insider trading scandal had damaged the company’s reputation, and the life savings of former colleagues had evaporated in the face of Qwest’s stock troubles.

“It was a good place,” he said wistfully. “And then something like this happened.”

Now, Mr. Ellingson is the public face of a proposed ballot measure in Colorado that seeks to create what supporters hope will be the nation’s toughest corporate fraud law.

Buttressed by local advocacy groups and criticized by a Colorado business organization, the measure would make business executives criminally responsible if their companies run afoul of the law. It would also permit any Colorado resident to sue the executives under such circumstances. Proceeds from successful suits would go to the state.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Justice for ALL criminals. What a concept.
In 'Murka?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. how about some accountability for the
CHIEF executive? grrrr. it's looking like i won't live long enough to see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. If you're not a crook you have..
nothing to fear. Since when did any Chamber of Commerce care about anyone other than themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah
Why don't we throw their meme about wiretapping back at these facist sacks of shit. "If you're not a criminal what do you have to fear?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-01-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. k&r'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. The penalties for white collar crime are lame.
Enron is the poster child of a company that harmed thousands irreparably, yet the responsible parties walked away, largely unscathed, several with their fortunes intact.

Additionally, when someone like Ken Lay transfers vast assets to his wife's name for the sole purpose of protecting them from from a legal judgment, the current laws protecting spousal assets need to be redrawn. She should have been left with only those assets she brought into the marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. But what money would Kenny boy live on now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Shhhhhhhhhh. Dumbya and the gang might need to use that hidey hole too.
Let's leave it "undiscovered" until it's full, then....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Nah
Let EVERYONE discover that hidey hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC