... but cannot claim total understanding, not being of a minority group, myself. Regardless of what LeBron, Giselle, Annie Liebowitz or Vogue intended to communicate in the photo*, I understand that many would take umbrage with the photo,
given historical precedents -- and even more so now that I see the original image that obviously inspired it.
* Who knows, given Giselle's German ancestry, maybe they were trying to make a statement of how far we've come in the last hundred years... no longer enemies with the Germans, and more racially diverse. Without Liebowitz admitting the source of the photo's inspiration and what she intended, we'll likely never know -- and so are left to interpret the work, each in our own way, based on our individual perceptions and experiences.
As for King Kong, that the Vogue cover photo wasn't based literally on King Kong doesn't change the fact that the cover photo took its inspiration from within a long line of "damsel dragged-off by brute" representations, making King Kong and the Vogue cover siblings, of a sort, in that both appear to have been inspired by the same propaganda poster.
1887 - Emmanuel Frémiet Gorilla Carrying off a Woman 1887 Bronze1917 - "Destroy This Mad Brute" WW I propaganda poster1933 - King Kong movie poster (still?)2008 - James/Bunchen Vogue cover