|
It was the best of times. It was the worst of times. So the story goes. Elliot Spitzer and "Kristen" had their good times, and now they are havin their worst. The worst, in this case, are the result of media glare, however, and not the seemingly "usual" result of their mutual behavior.
And the mutually consenting nature of their behavior is a boiler plate for a renewed discussion on the legality of prostitution.
First, I must say, I am no fan of prostitution. It's not that I judge prostitutes. Or johns. It's that I don't think it's the best relationship for anyone involved, directly or indirectly. Prostitution hurts families, wives, husbands, girlfriends, boyfriends, children...
But the argument that it hurts neighborhoods and burdens law enforcement is merely a function of the illegality of the act.
I wholly dismiss the verbose feminist argument that prostitution hurts women as a whole. The prostitute is a willing party, acting entirely for her own economic advantage. As in the case of Kristen, prostitutes sell their wares because they gain an economic advanage by so doing; they simply make more money by selling sex than they would by flipping burgers, or by any other job for which they might be qualified. Otherwise, they wouldn't do it.
I wholly dismiss the Bronze Age, biblical admonition that men who buy sex offend God. I think they offend their wives, but God does not judge the john any more than he judges the alcoholic: as merely a sick person.
And that's the way I see it. Alcohol is legal because we found out, as a culture, that illegalisation was not a solution to willing, non-victimising, behavior. That which does not involve theft of property or violence unto a person (or sometimes an animal) is generally a "victimless crime". These so-called crimes need to be decriminalised. Prostitution needs to be legal, albeit regulated and contained.
I'm not saying Elliot Spitzer is innocent; he is not. Spitzer's hypocrisy, and his betrayal of the peoples' trust is cause enough for his resignation; however, he should not be prosecuted, because prosecution of an act, regardless of the legal status of the act, is unconscionable in the case of two mutually consenting adults engaging in an act that neither perpetrates violence against another, nor steals property from another.
I will bet there are holes in my argument as stated. To give credence to this subject would surely entail a book-length post. But there are two tails in this story, two asses in slings, and neither need be as such. Elliot Spitzer sold his career for a piece of ass, and Kristen unwittingly sold her anonymity. But both made their choices, without the involvement of anyone else, and the legal system needs to stay out of it.
That doesn't mean the voters don't have a say, though. But that's a moot point now. For the future, however, we need to legalise prostitution, because illegalising the behavior of two mutually consenting adults that does not violate the rights of another is, morally and ethically, not the business of government.
|