Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Convoluted explanation for appeals decision to support secret plea of Kontogiannis...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 01:00 PM
Original message
Convoluted explanation for appeals decision to support secret plea of Kontogiannis...

This story isn't being carried in many places... Anyway, here's a summary that includes some convoluted attempts to explain why they are allowed to keep the plea of Thomas Kontogiannis (who's been convicted of money laundering that is related to the Brent Wilkes, Dusty Foggo, and Duke Cunningham scandals). The Union Tribune here sued to try and unseal the court documents, but were refused. This article goes into a bit more of the explanation of why it should stay closed. Confused with it? So am I! Methinks that is the intent...

http://www.rcfp.org/news/2008/0313-sct-courtf.html

NEWS MEDIA UPDATE NINTH CIRCUIT Secret Courts March 13, 2008
Court finds presumption of openness in plea documents

A federal appeals court ruled in two separate cases regarding sealed secret plea agreements and the public's First Amendment right of access in a convoluted legal battle.

March 13, 2008 A federal appeals court held that documents relating to a secret guilty plea of a drug cartel defendant, including the summary of what he was pleading to, are presumed open, yet ruled that portions of hearings conducted to determine whether to make public or keep sealed those documents are closed.

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (9th Cir.) also issued a brief, unpublished memorandum the same day, March 4, on a separate matter regarding the guilty plea of a New York businessman charged with money laundering that is in line with its published opinion.

...

"So by publishing these transcripts, we would force litigants to take a great risk," Kozinski wrote. "If they move to seal and lose, they make public all the additional secrets they have revealed to us in making a case for sealing the proceedings."

In the unpublished opinion, the same panel stated that the same type of hearings and transcripts in the Kontogiannis case will also remain sealed by following the same "compelling interest" standard.

Both cases began cloaked with much more secrecy, with U.S. District Court Judge Larry Burns agreeing to temporarily seal the entire proceedings to maintain the safety of those involved in both cases. As months went on, however, Burns deemed the safety risk was much lower and ordered most of the plea transcript and documents unsealed. Burns eventually released even more documents and portions of the hearings where prosecutors explained their reasons for wanting secrecy.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-15-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. That just sounds like a roundabout way of saying
If it's unsealed "they make public all the additional secrets"

I have a real "Well. . DUH!" kind of feeling about this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep 18th 2014, 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC