Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jawbone of an Ass: Bush's Utter Failure with OPEC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:24 AM
Original message
Jawbone of an Ass: Bush's Utter Failure with OPEC
March 06, 2008

In the pantheon of his presidential failures, the utter inability of former Texas oilman George W. Bush to influence OPEC and the price of oil stands out as the most predictable - and ironic. Just one day after OPEC members rejected President Bush's call to boost crude production, oil jumped to the stratospheric level of $105 a barrel. This latest indignity caps seven years without results for the man who once boasted he would "jawbone" his friends in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia into opening the spigots.

<snip>

By June 2000, the Bush jawbone pledge became a standard on the stump. As the New York Times reported, Bush foreshadowed future expenditures of political capital he would fail to accumulate:

"I would work with our friends in OPEC to convince them to open up the spigot, to increase the supply," Mr. Bush, the presumptive Republican candidate for president, told reporters here today. "Use the capital that my administration will earn, with the Kuwaitis or the Saudis, and convince them to open up the spigot."

<snip>

Meanwhile in Washington, White House press secretary Dana Perino admitted yesterday that the President is "disappointed that they decided not to increase production." President Bush himself whined of OPEC's intransigence that "I think it's a mistake to have your biggest customer's economy to slow down." Powerless now as throughout his presidency, Bush feebly concluded "Until we change our habits, there's going to be more dependency on oil."

Which just goes to show the American people what happens when they place their trust in the jawbone of an ass.



http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/000968.htm


This is a very good article, with links to document every claim and quote.

According to the Energy Information Administration, the average US price of regular gasoline was $1.46 a gallon when Bush 43 assumed the presidency. Gas Buddy reports today's average at $3.23.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent resource.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yes, I've already used it to smack down a silly Republican assertion
Guy was saying Congressional Democrats should share blame for today's gas prices. I pointed out that since Junior didn't mention Congressional Republicans, who had held the majority for six years in January 2000, then we shouldn't blame Congressional Democrats, who have had the majority for one year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is what happens when you allow Cliff Barnes and J.R.Ewing
to take charge of the top two positions in government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Not exactly, Barnes and Ewing were successful oilmen.
Junior was a failure and Poppy had to get him bailed out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Very Clever Headline!
Of course they all know W., the Idiot Son of the the Idiot Father. Of course OPEC isn't going to pay any attention. They know who the real master is...and it isn't Cheney, either, although he was closer.

Why else would Chavez be such a target. He's more powerful than the reputed Leader of the Free World, since W broke the army on Iraq's sandy shores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Yeah, this guy is good.
Note that today's price of oil is now higher than the inflation-adjusted record set back in April 1980. Think I'll set the Wayback Machine to that period to see what Saint Ronnie had to say about Carter on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. I like it too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bush was "outraged" when gas hit a buck fifty a gallon
When analysts are predicting $4 for a gallon of gas, George confesses ignorance about the prospect, and merely says, "That's interesting." Of course, when one of his limos pulls up to the pump, it's not like George reaches for his wallet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Yep...The REAL Mission Accomplished
In the 90's, big oil complained that they were scraping the bottom...prices were TOO low and this was their justification that was later used to give them the big tax breaks under their BFEE buddies.

Think of the rise of the price of oil over these years as the real boooosh tax hike...as the price went up, so did the money collected in taxes that went to fund his war for profit, which in turn, destabilized the oil market and drove the price higher. Of course, the asshat doesn't know what the price of a gallon of gas is...when was the last time you think he ever filled his own tank or had to even think about paying for it? All he cared was seeing the dividends rise and the profits rolling in that surely have found their way into his many pockets and that of his cabal.

When one has a charmed life in a bubble, reality means nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. First president in my life not to open Federal Reserves
to counter balance the cut in oil production by foreign states.
He acts as if he and his coven of crude cronies are secret members of OPEC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. Jawbone of an ass -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. That face may one day
adorn the front of a $3.00 bill. Yick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Heee heee, that's pretty good.
Overloaded my sensors though. Yuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. the simple fact is- they won't increase production because they CAN'T increase production.
it's called "peak oil", and we're there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. I think you're right.
But Republican rhetoric has been quite different and Junior made some tall claims about what he was going to be able to do. Now they own the problem.

To me the issue is not how we're going to get gas prices significantly lower because I don't think anybody could do that now. My point is, look what a disgusting bunch of hypocrites, liars, and fools these Republicans are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. But . . but . . it's the value of the dollar . .
Really?



http://worthwhile.typepad.com/worthwhile_canadian_initi/2007/10/recent-oil-pric.html
http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2007/10/does_dollar_wea_1.html

OK. But . . but . . it's speculators . .

Really?

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/goldman-sachs-raises-possibility-200/story.aspx?guid=%7B4B702F7F%2D41F8%2D45F0%2DA133%2D630F12F2C764%7D&dist=TNMostRead

"As the lack of supply growth and price-insulated non-OECD demand suggest a future rebound in U.S. gross domestic product growth or a major oil supply disruption could lead to $150-$200 a barrel oil prices," Goldman said. Goldman also reiterated its view that oil prices could fall as normal market conditions return over the next four years. "The core of our 'super-spike' view is that oil prices will keep rising until demand declines globally on a multiyear basis, resulting in the return of excess capacity and a lower cost structure," Goldman's analysts said. "Given this view, once excess capacity returns, we think prices can move sharply lower."

Lot of supply talk from Goldman-Sachs there.



Also, anyone wonder why speculators would be running to a market where any day KSA can open their spigot and put an additional 4 M bbl/dy (as I have been told here on DU) into the market? Or, just maybe, the speculators have figured out there is no more supply (rate), and little possibility of a decrease in demand over the near term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
16. Bush’s senior economic advisor said gas prices would lower as a result of invading Iraq
Just wanted to add this tidbit so I can find it later:

Laurence Lindsey – President Bush’s senior economic advisor at the time — argued in 2002 that the Iraq war would increase oil supplies and lower prices. From the Washington Times, 9/19/02:

As for the impact of a war with Iraq, “It depends how the war goes.” But he quickly adds that that “Under every plausible scenario, the negative effect will be quite small relative to the economic benefits that would come from a successful prosecution of the war.”

“The key issue is oil, and a regime change in Iraq would facilitate an increase in world oil,” which would drive down oil prices, giving the U.S. economy an added boost.

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/19/bartlett-caught-in-lie/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I'm Shocked. SHOCKED! That Lindsey Was Wrong
Because he has only been such a brilliant economic theoretician and has been correct in his predictions so often.

NOT!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC