Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Savage Weiner's court case against CAIR is looking like a loser for the Weiner.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 01:17 PM
Original message
The Savage Weiner's court case against CAIR is looking like a loser for the Weiner.
(03-07) 11:50 PST San Francisco (AP) --

A federal judge said Friday that she was leaning toward tossing out conservative radio talk show host Michael Savage's copyright theft lawsuit against an Islamic lobbying group who used portions of the popular program to solicit donations and call for an advertising boycott of "The Savage Nation."

U.S. District Judge Susan Illston said she would likely let Savage's attorney submit a revised lawsuit in attempt to keep the case alive, but she found the other side's arguments "persuasive."

Savage sued the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, after it posted on its Web site a 4-minute clip of Savage's two-hour show on Oct. 29 in which the talk show host called the Quran a "book of hate."

CAIR placed the clip next to an area to make donations and its call to boycott "The Savage Nation" show heard by as many as 8 million listeners a day. The Washington D.C.-based group said it and allied organizations have convinced more than a dozen companies, including Wal-Mart Stores Inc., GEICO insurance company and Sprint Nextel Corp., to withhold advertising from the show.

Savage's attorney Daniel Horowitz argued Friday that CAIR's use of the clip "was taken for purely commercial purposes and to damage" the show.

"This property is Michael Savage's and they have to justify why they are taking it," Horowitz said.

But the judge said she found "persuasive" CAIR's arguments that free speech protections allowed the organization to use the clip to criticize and comment on Savage's views even if the content is used for fundraising purposes.

CAIR's attorney Thomas Burke argued that a federal appeals court validated that position in 1986 when it said the Moral Majority could use Hustler Magazine's unflattering parody of the religious group's founder Rev. Jerry Falwell to raise money for a legal fund.

"Michael Savage is just unwilling to accept criticism going the other way," Burke said outside court. "This lawsuit is about punishing CAIR for criticizing him."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/n/a/200...

It's not dead yet but it's on life support.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Loser" and "Weiner" - Isn't that a bid redundant?
They are one and the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That was sent over from the department of redundancy department.
:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Now I understand. I'm sorry. I understand now. I'm sorry.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's good news-
I'll join ya in a Ha Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Shouldn't Weiner be castigated
for filing a blatantly frivolous lawsuit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I live for the day...
that while he's on air, the authorities, having determined that he is a danger to himself and others, enter his studio, shoot him with a ketamine dart that puts him into the mother of all K-Holes and trundle him off to a long, long stay at Happy Acres.

I remember the halcyon era when that would have happened to someone who does the stuff he does on the radio.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Dec 22nd 2014, 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC