Should the U.S. continue to use waterboarding on suspected terrorists?

[alfredo]

That is the question being posted on http://www.cnn.com / Let your DU vote be hear on their quick vote.
Thank you.

At this time not enough votes have been cast to show. It is 0-0, but that will change.

[EmperorHasNoClothes]

1. I just voted "No" and now it's saying Yes 100% No 0%

WTF, CNN?

[annabanana]

2. wtf 100% . . n/t

[JBoy]

3. Currently Yes 42%, No 58%

[tekisui]

4. They don't have a "Fuck no" option.

[Jim__]

5. No 56%.

[Richard D]

6. no

Yes 44% 2661
No 56% 3339
Total Votes: 6000

[pleah]

7. Just voted NO 56 to 44

[alfredo]

13. It's still holding at 56-44 at 1433 EST.

[bryant69]

8. As opposed to using on people they don't suspect of being terrorists?

No wait - that doesn't make any sense. As opposed to doing it at all.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com

[Orsino]

14. Yep. Push poll. n/t

[ConcernedCanuk]

9. Sad state of affairs that this is even a QUESTION! and 44% still think torture is ok

.
.
.

Let them 44% be "water-boarded"

They might change their mind.

[kestrel91316]

10. NO.

[NNN0LHI]

11. I wonder if the people voting Yes realize EVERYONE is a suspect?

Probably not.

Don

[Malikshah]

12. How about known terrorists? *, Darth Cheney, Rice, etc.

Using violence against civilians for political aims....

fits the bill with these miscreants.

Of course, there's nothing we want to know from them. The lies are all public.

It would only be as punishment and cruelty....

Oh...wait-- that's why we waterboard anyway, right?

Ok, then... Have at it.

[alfredo]

15. That might be the only way Cheney can get it up without Viagra.