Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US-Oman Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act -

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:08 AM
Original message
US-Oman Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act -
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 03:07 AM by Breeze54
June 28, 2006

S. 3569, the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act

http://democrats.senate.gov/dpc/dpc-new.cfm?doc_name=lb-109-2-92

Summary and Background

S. 3569, the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (the “Oman Act”), as reported by the Senate Finance Committee, would implement the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement (the “Agreement” or the “FTA”). In 2003, President Bush announced his intent to pursue Free Trade Agreements with Oman, the United Arab Emirates (“UAE”), and other Middle Eastern nations, and to establish a Middle East Free Trade Area (“MEFTA”) by 2013, as part of its strategy to promote democratic and economic reforms in the region. The United States has already implemented Free Trade Agreements with Jordan, Morocco, and Bahrain.

More.......

Snip--->

Labor

As in other FTAs, the labor chapter does not require the parties to have labor laws that meet basic, internationally-recognized standards; the parties only agree to “strive to ensure” that their labor laws are consistent with internationally recognized labor rights. Where parties fail to effectively enforce their labor laws (whatever those laws happen to be), they may be subject to dispute settlement provisions as outlined in the Agreement. The dispute settlement provisions for labor and environment issues are distinct from those applicable to other provisions of the Agreement – generally involving longer time lines and using fines rather than suspension of benefits as the penalty.

The Agreement also establishes a Labor Cooperation Mechanism, which facilitates cooperation on fundamental worker rights and their effective application, working conditions, and other relevant issues.

Oman has ratified the International Labor Organization’s (“ILO”) Convention 29 on forced labor, Convention 182 on the worst forms of child labor, Convention 105 on the abolition of forced labor, and Convention 183 on the minimum age of employment. Oman has ratified the United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children. Oman also has a U.S.-funded technical assistance program with the ILO.

Omani workers had no representation prior to the 2003 labor law, which created worker representative committees. Oman and the USTR argue that these serve similar purposes as unions, but others have pointed out that management serves on the representative committees. About 30 representative committees had been formed as of May 2006, according to the United States Embassy in Oman. The law also provides for dispute settlement between employers and employees, fines for violations of the law, maximum working hours, and equal treatment for women. Labor issues are discussed more fully below in the section entitled, “Other Considerations.”

Labor. (“Other Considerations”)

A number of Democrats have raised concerns about Oman’s labor laws. Until 2003, unions were outlawed in Oman. Starting in 2003, Oman allowed worker representation committees, which Oman maintains serve similar functions to unions. House Democrats have argued that in various areas – both in law and enforcement – Oman’s laws do not meet the basic “core” standards established by the International Labor Organization. Specifically, concerns have been raised about the role of management in the representation committees, whether there is a right to strike in practice and in law, whether there is a right to engage in collective bargaining in practice and in law, and whether there are adequate protections for foreign workers. USTR and the Government of Oman maintain that in law and in practice, Oman’s labor standards do meet ILO minimums. Oman has agreed to make additional changes to its laws in October of this year. Negotiations with House Democrats had been ongoing but are unresolved as of the date of this document.

:redbox: In addition, the Bush Administration stripped out a Conrad/Bingaman/Kerry amendment adopted unanimously (on a recorded vote) by the Senate Finance Committee. The amendment would have prohibited any goods made with slave labor, forced labor, or labor that had been subject to human trafficking from benefiting from the preferential access provided for in the FTA. The genesis for this amendment was a report alleging that companies in Jordan were importing workers from Bangladesh, Pakistan, and other poor countries, taking away their passports, working them 80-100 hours per week, paying them inadequately if at all, and subjecting them to physical intimidation and in some cases violence. The report alleged that many of these workers actually paid recruiters thousands of dollars to get these “good jobs” and so could not leave until they had earned enough money to pay off their debts.

---

Proponents and Opponents


Supporters of the Oman FTA include the Business Roundtable, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce,
the National Association of Manufacturers, and the Emergency Committee for American Trade.

The FTA is opposed by 400 organizations, including all of the leading labor unions.
Other opponents include faith-based organizations such as the Presbyterian Church USA and the
United Methodist Church. Environmental groups such as the Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the
Earth, Sierra Club, and the Western Organization of Resource Councils also oppose the Oman FTA.

---------

U.S.-Oman Free Trade Agreement Implementation - Key Vote (How all members voted)

http://www.votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_member.php?cs_id=V3902

IL - Jr Senator Barack H. Obama - Democrat - Y

NY - Jr Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - Democrat - Y

AZ - Sr Senator John S. McCain - Republican -Y

:wtf: They both voted FOR this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. VOTE ALERT: GOP & Dem Senators Join Hands to Sell Out America...Again
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 02:36 AM by Breeze54
VOTE ALERT: GOP & Dem Senators Join Hands to Sell Out America...Again

By David Sirota

http://tabacco.blog-city.com/oman_free_trade_agreement_passes_senate_10_democrats_sold_us.htm

snip-->

So who were the key sellouts that voted for this pact?

First and foremost, every Republican other than Burr, Dole, Coburn, Snowe, Collins, Chafee and Gregg. The GOPer who is likely to get hit hardest for this at home is Sen. Mike DeWine (R-OH). He's running against populist Congressman Sherrod Brown (D-OH), who has been one of the few courageous champions in Congress fighting both parties' complicity in these kinds of sellout trade policies.

Sadly, there were also 10 Democrats who sold out and voted for this trade pact. They were Baucus, Cantwell, Clinton, Kerry, Landrieu, Lieberman, Nelson (FL), Nelson (NE), Obama and Salazar. I was surprised to see Kerry among those - he had recently pledged to get more serious about reforming our trade policy. Hillary Clinton - well, let's just keep these kinds of votes in mind when she runs for President.

Then there is Lieberman - a guy who has consistently voted to sellout American workers. I hope Ned Lamont hammers him for this latest sellout - and reminds Connecticut voters that Lieberman is so out of step that even Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) voted against this thing.

Finally, Obama. What can I say? He told me in my interview with him that he was serious about demanding stronger labor, environmental and human rights protections in trade deals. But in his speech that attempted to justify his vote, he simply said that, "I have been informed by the State Department that Oman has been a valuable partner for the United States." Put another way, he's telling us because the Bush political hacks at the State Department ignored that agency's own damning reports about Oman's record and told him to vote for the pact, he did. Sad.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I hope Sherrod Brown runs for president someday.
He very rarely makes mistakes and is a true progressive champion that's actually (gasp) electable.

DeWine was so pathetic in trying to demonize him. Brown won this state in a real mandate (what was it, 55 to 44)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. He sounds like a real champion against these FT agreements!
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 08:25 AM by Breeze54
What state is he from again? DeWine is out now, right? You must be in CA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ohio.
Brown also has a book out - definitely worth reading.

http://www.amazon.com/Myths-Free-Trade-American-Revised/dp/1595581243/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1204032629&sr=8-3

I see a Republiclown from my city gave it a one star review. You know, because offshoring jobs must be a good thing to these jokers. Yeah, let's give ALL the money to the wealthy and hope they'll be benevolent. That makes an asston of sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks....
I'm half asleep. Sorry. I'll check out that link later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. And of course... AZ - Sr Senator John S. McCain - Republican - Y
Couldn't add after edit time expired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. There must be a shut down of any more info
about Oman and slave labor and the sex trade because I've
been searching and I can't find anything current after 2006.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC