Death penalty for 6 Guantánamo inmates sought - because of Geneva Convention
The US has repeatedly argued the inmates in Guantanamo are not covered by the protections of the Geneva Convention as they are no military fighters in the classic sense. The US denotes them as “enemy combatants.”
But now there is this:
Military prosecutors have decided to seek the death penalty for six Guantánamo detainees who are to be charged with central roles in the Sept. 11 terror attacks, government officials who have been briefed on the charges said Sunday.
The officials said the charges would be announced at the Pentagon as soon as Monday and were likely to include
numerous war-crime charges against the six men, including Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the former Qaeda operations chief who has described himself as the mastermind of the attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people. (…) NY Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/11/us/11gitmo.html?_r=3&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin Interesting. So what exactly is a war crime then? Let’s turn to the US Code on that one:
§ 2441. War crimes
(c) Definition.— As used in this section the term
“war crime” means any conduct—
(1) defined as a grave breach in any of the international conventions signed at Geneva 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party of,US Code, TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 118, §2441, War crimes
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/11/us/11gitmo.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin&oref=sloginTo sum it up: They are there because the Geneva Convention does not apply to them.
Now they must die, because they broke the Geneva Convention. http://www.sebimeyer.com/2008/02/11/death-penalty-for-6-guantanamo-inmates-sought-because-of-geneva-convention/