Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

35-hour workweek

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:33 PM
Original message
35-hour workweek
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/35-hour_workweek

The 35-hour working week is a measure adopted first in France, in February 2000, under Prime Minister Lionel Jospin's Plural Left government; it was pushed by then Minister of Labour Martine Aubry. The previous legal duration of the workweek was 39 hours, which had been established by François Mitterrand, also a member of the Socialist Party. The 35-hour working week was already in the Socialist Party's 1981 electoral program, titled 110 Propositions for France.

The 35 hours was the legal standard limit, after which further working time was to be considered overtime. The law has since been substantially weakened and exceptions have become established.

Rationale

(See working time for further discussion of the health and leisure-related reasons for limited work weeks.)

The main stated objectives of the law were two-fold:

To reduce unemployment and yield a better division of labor, in a context where some people work long hours while some others are unemployed. A 10.2% decrease in the hours extracted from each worker would, theoretically, require firms to hire correspondingly more workers, a remedy for unemployment.

To take advantage of improvements in productivity of modern society in order to give workers some more personal time in order to enhance their quality of life.

Another reason was that the Jospin administration took advantage of the changes introduced with the 35-hour working week in order to relax other workforce legislation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaksavage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like the 30
no wait, 25 hour work week better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. for the same pay? forget about it.
actually, one time i worked the night shift. it was a 30 hour week with the same pay as 35.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I like 32. - Four 8 hour days.
That would be like 10 weeks of vacation a year.

Of course, I recently took a huge paycut to go from 40 to 20 back in September 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. My office does 4-10's in the summer.
It was first implemented to cut energy usage, but everyone likes the three day weekends every week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. in new york city 35 hours is the normal
work week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. *sigh
im on here all the time.


because I'm at work all the time

60+ hour work week

i do tech support, I don't have projects all the time, I just need the hours to stay afloat. I don't even own a house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. i worked those hours, but was paid overtime
after 35 hours -- double time on sundays and triple on holidays. i did it for years and i think that's why i came down with "chronic fatigue syndrome".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. yeah just a contractor (after eight months)
so i only ever get time and a half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. i worked in a law firm.
i had very good benefits. first year -- 4 weeks vacation.

if you had to be at work before 7 am and left after 7 pm we got a limo home. also got a limo on weekends and holidays. we also got lunch and dinner money if we were on overtime.

on the downside, it could be very stressful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. Same deal when I worked in law firms in the 1980s and 1990s
It was fun at first, but after a couple weeks of 20 hour days and virtually no sleep, I decided it was not for me. So, now I work in the legal department of a non-governmental organization in Washington DC. I get 6 weeks of vacation since I've been there over 10 years. We work an 8.5 hour day. I do work late some days, but in the 12 years I've been there, I've only worked 3 all nighters. I do occasionally have to make calls to China or Indonesia from home around 10 or 11 pm or participate in a conference call, but hey, it's at home. I can be in my pajamas with the dogs cuddling around me and a beverage of choice in my hand. And since I work on projects literally all around the world it's really interesting. Right now I'm working on a project in Moldova, one in Bulgaria, a couple in Indonesia and China, Costa Rica, Honduras, Peru, Turkey and Nigeria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Man do I hear u
back when i was a code monkey, I loved those sixty hour weeks, they were so much nicer than the sixty five hour weeks, particularly when part of that was air time.

The only forty hour weeks were when i was between work. And that was shaking the trees for work.

And then I nearly died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Among the reasons we went
from a 60 hour work week to a 40 hour work week in this country during the Great Depression was to create more jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Makes sense to me. Unfortunately I've been putting in 50-60 hours every
week for the past seven years without a vacation. When I worked at a large Feature Animation studio 60-85 hours a week was considered "average". I haven't seen a 35 hour work week since High School!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I completely understand, I'm an IT slave
Overtime? What the hell is that?

I long for the day when IT is unionized, but I think we're afraid that our jobs will just be outsourced if we rise up. I've been taken advantage of for about 7 straight years now. 60 hour weeks are standard, no vacation, no sick days, nothing. If I try to just put in 8 hours a day I get screamed at by three or four different people. I'm basically living in the "Office Space" script.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Isn't the new guy who just married the supermodel trying to do away with the 35-hour workweek?
I thought that was one of the things he ran on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudbase Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. My sister has a pretty sweet deal.
She's a nurse, and works 16 hours on Saturday and 16 on Sunday. She gets paid for a standard 40 hour week, and has the regular workweek off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Wow, I'd do that in a second!
I know it's tough work, but having 5 days off in a row would be dreamy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. In many hospitals that's pretty brutal.
You'd almost need those five days off to keep your sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. I don't want anyone making important decisions
who has been working more than 12 hours - it's crap. I work 12 hour shifts and I know what it feels like at the end of the shift or when it bleeds into 13, 14, 15 hours - this "sweet" deal is f***ing dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. I worked 60-80 hrs. per week when just starting my career
you gotta pay your dues when young. I'm down to 40-45 now, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. My normal shift for over a decade was 7 twelve hour days with overtime
We had the choice of working 7 in the morning to 7 at night or 7 at night to 7 in the morning. Once in a great while we would go down to 7 eight hours days for a week or two and it felt like we were working only half a day.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. not me
I'm 50 and worked 62 hours last week
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. During the last "Great Depression"...
...congress actually sent a 30 or 32 hour week bill to FDR who traded it off for the CCC and other make work projects...he later said that was a mistake.With the productivity gains of the last ten years business could give back 20% of the workweek and STILL be ahead of 1990. Their gain would be reduced unemployment increasing the pool of available consumers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. In the U.S., where most are paid hourly, that means a pay cut.
Unless you're one of the lucky few who gets a fixed salary, a cut in hours is essentially a cut in pay.

Besides, as I understand it, the limit in France really hasn't worked out all that well. Most employers simply increased demands on workers to get more done in less time instead of creating new jobs. Workers get more time off, but they're now worked even harder while they're actually working. There's a fairly strong movement in France to abolish the shorter week because it hasn't achieved any of its original goals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. Now we know why the U.S. government really wants to hate the French
I came to that conclusion after I saw "Sicko".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. I'd vote for a 5 hour work week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC