Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prosecutor to Review Official Handling of C.I.A. Tapes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 09:53 AM
Original message
Prosecutor to Review Official Handling of C.I.A. Tapes
Prosecutor to Review Official Handling of C.I.A. Tapes

By SCOTT SHANE
Published: February 10, 2008

The prosecutor investigating the Central Intelligence Agency’s destruction of interrogation videotapes is reviewing whether government officials violated any of 17 court orders requiring the preservation of evidence or broke the law by concealing the tapes’ existence or approving their destruction, according to court papers filed late Friday night.

The seven-page declaration by the prosecutor, John H. Durham, gives the most detailed account to date of plans for his month-old criminal investigation, involving hundreds of hours of video recordings of harsh interrogations of two Qaeda suspects, Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri.

It gives no indication that his team of F.B.I. agents and lawyers intends, at least for now, to go beyond the tapes to examine whether the C.I.A.’s harsh interrogation techniques, including waterboarding, themselves violated the law.

...................

He described the “central questions” for investigators as including “who within the federal government knew of the existence of the videotaped interrogations at issue; who was aware of the various orders that might have required the preservation of the videotapes; and who was involved in any way, in the decision and/or directive to destroy the videotapes.”

more at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/10/us/10tapes.html?scp=3&sq=destroyed+tapes&st=nyt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cofer Black.
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 10:26 AM by sattahipdeep
“They are no longer entitled to a presumption that the government has acted lawfully or in good faith,”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC