|
I will gladly vote for either Hillary or Obama, but I will guarantee you this..
The people who were just turned on to politics by the Obama campaign, and its promise of a "new party", and the old time faithfuls who were insulted by Bill's South Carolina antics, will stay home in November if they sniff arm-twisting and conniving "politics as usual".
I am sensing the "deal-brokers" butting into the process...big-time. Most people do not understand the "super-delegate" thing, or if they do, they see it as an intrusive way to un-do the whole process of the primary system? Why not just have MORE super-delegates (who know better than the rest of us) and do away with the whole pretense of voting in the first place :sarcasm:
If the deal-makers step in and try to "end it early for the sake of unity", it will set the party back, and will hurt the "down-ticket" races as well.
Right now, we are in the rah-rah stage, and everyone's fired up, but the whole thing could become a nightmare if we end up shooting down a candidacy that draws people in the 10s of thousands, and puts forward the message, that no matter how many people show up for one person, and no matter how energized the party is, the big-shots will step in and negate the whole movement..
Movements always scare party leaders
The exhuberance of JFK's candidacy & administration scared people...so did the candidacy of RFK...and Dean..
We know what happened to the first two, and the media "did the job" on the 3rd one..
As heady as the Obama campaign is, I think the party is afraid of losing control, and if they step over that invisible line (in the public's eyes), they will rein it all back in, but they will also "turn off" about 1/3 of their voters.
This time around, it might be enough to still win, but they could lose more, in the process..
|