Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

***FISA Battle: Stand and Be Counted***

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:18 AM
Original message
***FISA Battle: Stand and Be Counted***
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 10:19 AM by babylonsister
http://alternet.org/blogs/peek/74796/#more

FISA Battle: Stand and Be Counted

Posted by Christy Hardin Smith, Firedoglake at 6:58 AM on January 24, 2008.

Who will stand for the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the rule of law in the Senate and be counted today?


Who will stand for the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the rule of law in the Senate and be counted today? Who will stand up with Sens. Chris Dodd and Russ Feingold and put their values on the line, standing up for the foundations of American government over political expediency, a "get out of jail free" card for Dick Cheney and his minions including telecoms, and a pending airline ticket to Davos.

Hey Dick and telecoms: if you do not take the rule of law seriously, then you have no business asking for a favor and a pass. That applies to Vice Presidents and their minions as much as it does for large corporations who have scads of legal beagles on retainer, fully capable of reading the FISA law and comprehending the straightforward penalty provisions and warrant requirements. The Bush Administration should not be allowed to use Congress as their own, personal CYA brigade. Period.

The Feinstein "compromise" amendment? Nothing but fluff and capitulation, dressed up in a tidy little package -- and contrary to the FISA law as written. Glenn has the lowdown. The Courage Campaign has more. For my money, the Dodd/Feingold Amendment is a far superior option that removes retroactive immunity, and stands for the rule of law, not in contravention of it.

Here's the reality of the fight today, via CQ:

Crucially, the bill also would grant retroactive legal immunity to telecommunications companies that have been sued for their alleged role in the National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping program between the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and August 2007, when the latest, temporary version of the law was enacted. The White House has repeatedly called for such immunity.

The Senate Judiciary Committee approved its own version of the bill without retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies by a 10-9 party-line vote Nov. 15, a decision it ratified by voice vote the following day after a procedural question was raised.

Reid plans to again allow the Judiciary panel's bill to be offered on the floor as a substitute for the Intelligence panel's version. The Senate is expected to vote Thursday on a motion to table that substitute.

Dodd, who is opposed to retroactive immunity, threatened to use every procedural delay available to him if the immunity is not stripped....

Even if the bill overcomes its considerable hurdles in the Senate, a deal with the House on FISA legislation would be nearly impossible before the Feb. 1 expiration of the temporary law. The House passed a FISA overhaul bill (HR 3773) in November that lacks immunity for the telecommunications providers, drawing a White House veto threat....

House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer , D-Md., noting that the House would not have enough time to reach a deal with the Senate next week on longer-term legislation, pressed House Minority Whip Roy Blunt , R-Mo., to get on board with a one-month extension. Blunt was noncommittal but said the intelligence community needed to have at least the spying authority it has now, without interruption.


And that, in a nutshell, is where things stand as we begin the day today. Please, take some time to call your elected representatives -- Senators and House members. Tell them they must stand up for the Constitution and the rule of law -- and that you expect them not to let lawbreakers off the hook. Now, let's hit the phones and FAXes...

Numbers for Senators are here. Numbers for House members are here. Toll-free numbers for Congress from Katymine:

1 (800) 828 - 0498

1 (800) 459 - 1887

1 (800) 614 - 2803

1 (866) 340 - 9281

1 (866) 338 - 1015

1 (877) 851 - 6437

We should also focus on the 14 Senators who promised to help Sens. Dodd and Feingold last December, and who pushed for removal of retroactive immunity. Here are their fax and phone numbers:

Name Fax Phone

Feingold (202) 224-2725 (202) 224-5323

Dodd (202) 224-1083 (202) 224-2823

Obama (202) 228-4260 (202) 224-2854

Sanders (202) 228-0776 (202) 224-5141

Menendez (202) 228-2197 (202) 224-4744

Biden (202) 224-0139 (202) 224-5042

Brown (202) 228-6321 (202) 224-2315

Harkin (202) 224-9369 (202) 224-3254

Cardin (202) 224-1651 (202) 224-4524

Clinton (202) 228-0282 (202) 224-4451

Akaka (202) 224-2126 (202) 224-6361

Webb (202) 228-6363 (202) 224-4024

Kennedy (202) 224-2417 (202) 224-4543

Boxer (415) 956-6701 (202) 224-3553
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks very much babylonsister! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Judiciary substitute
to be considered this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Called both of my pathetic Senators' offices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks, and FWIW, mine are also pathetic.
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC