There may be a more recent article than this. But one of the unintended consequences of the Bankruptcy law of 2005, caused people to pay off credit cards first, and lose their homes.
http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/articles/2007/11/11/shift_in_bankruptcy_laws_staggers_mortgage_holders/?rss_id=Boston+Globe+--+Business+NewsShift in bankruptcy laws staggers mortgage holdersNew rules prompt debtors to pay off credit cards first
Bloomberg News / November 11, 2007
Washington Mutual Inc. got what it wanted in 2005: a revised bankruptcy code that no longer lets people walk away from credit card bills.
The largest US savings and loan didn't count on a housing recession. The new bankruptcy laws are helping drive foreclosures to a record as homeowners default on mortgages and struggle to pay credit card debts that might have been wiped out under the old code, said Jay Westbrook, a professor of business law at the University of Texas Law School in Austin and a former adviser to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.
"Be careful what you wish for," Westbrook said. "They wanted to make sure that people kept paying their credit cards, and what they're getting is more foreclosures."
Washington Mutual, Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Citigroup Inc. spent $25 million in 2004 and 2005 lobbying for a legislative agenda that included changes in bankruptcy laws to protect credit card profits, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan Washington group that tracks political donations.
The banks are still paying for that decision. The surge in foreclosures has cut the value of securities backed by mortgages and led to more than $40 billion of writedowns for US financial institutions. It also reached to the top echelons of the financial services industry.
...
"We have people walking away from homes because they can't afford them even post bankruptcy," said Sommer, a Philadelphia-based bankruptcy attorney. "Their mortgage rates are resetting at levels that are completely unaffordable, and there's nothing the bankruptcy process can do for them as it now stands."
Slightly related to my earlier post:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2736510