Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do we take Iowa and New Hampshire so seriously? Both states allow open primaries.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:31 PM
Original message
Why do we take Iowa and New Hampshire so seriously? Both states allow open primaries.
The real test should be the states that only allow party members to vote in their own primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. really? I see it as the other way around.
I can accept that some states, like mine, only let a voter vote in one party's primary, but I don't see why only party members should get to choose the candidates, since we live in what is practically a one or two party state. Leaving out non-members means we miss the voices of lots of voters, who, as I see it, have just as much a right to choose who their elected officials will be as do party members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If people want to have a voice, they should join a party and get involved
If they don't care enough to do that, then why should we care what they think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm not a party member
In Michigan, you're asked if you want a Democratic or Republican ballot, and that record is public. The Dems know that I vote for them, as I always do, but as far as I'm concerned being an official party member would just create more useless bureaucracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Then you should also know that Dems in Michigan voted for McCain in 2000
I was there. They didn't vote for McCain because they wanted him to be president. They voted for McCain because he wasn't Bush, and it hurt Bush in the primary.

At the end of the day, it's ALL politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I know they did, but it's not as simple as you lay out
I think a lot of "democrats" in Michigan voted for McCain, because they did want him to be president. Scary, but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Because we want their vote in Novermber? Or do you think we should restrict that also?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They still have a "right" by being a member of a Party. Why should NON-members be allowed
to vote for a specific Party's candidate?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-08-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. because, there are only effectively two parties
Requiring membership in those parties to vote for who the candidates will be isn't much different than requiring membership in the communist party to get ahead in China. Being a member of the ruling/only party shouldn't afford one more privilege than those who are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC