Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Signs 'Open Government Act' - Immediately Rewrites Provisions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 01:09 PM
Original message
Bush Signs 'Open Government Act' - Immediately Rewrites Provisions
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 01:41 PM by bigtree
from Kos: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/2/9486/36922

Bush signs the Open Government Act in semi-secrecy

Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 06:48:06 AM PST

George Bush has signed into law S. 2488, a bill that strengthens the Freedom of Information Act. There are a lot of signs that Bush did not much like this Open Government Act, so it's significant that he didn't veto it.

As a point of comparison, let's look at which elements the Associated Press chose to include in its summary of the legislation. According to AP, the new law: (http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g2h-wOpWezQJGWaZ7AwxYmTJKxgAD8TSPOPG0)

* requires the release of requested documents unless their disclosure would do actual harm
* brings government contractors under FOIA
* compels the government to respond to FOIA requests within 20 days of their receipt
* creates a system by which citizens may track the progress of their requests
* establishes a hot-line service for all federal agencies to cope with problems
* establishes an ombudsman to help resolve disputes about non-disclosure


By contrast, the published WH summary mentions only that the law "amends (FOIA) by...": (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/12/20071231-4.html)

(1) establishing a definition of "a representative of the news media;" (2) directing that required attorney fees be paid from an agency's own appropriation rather than from the Judgment Fund; (3) prohibiting an agency from assessing certain fees if it fails to comply with FOIA deadlines; and (4) establishing an Office of Government Information Services in the National Archives and Records Administration to review agency compliance with FOIA.

You'll note that there's barely any overlap between the elements that the AP and the White House highlight. Furthermore the four elements listed by the WH say virtually nothing about the need or the mechanisms for greater openness – the very goal of the legislation . . .


post: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/2/9486/36922
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. It just never ends, does it?
This law school graduate (non-practicing) would truly appreciate it if someone (ANYONE) in Congress would grow a spine, and loudly protest this nonsense.

His administration needs to fully comply with the laws - as written.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. he makes Orwell look like Mother Goose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. By the OP title, I thought this was The Onion
Yet why am I not surpised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC