Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flight Suit (Bush) Gives Up; Decides to Negotiate with Taliban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:54 AM
Original message
Flight Suit (Bush) Gives Up; Decides to Negotiate with Taliban

Flight Suit Gives Up; Decides to Negotiate with Taliban

by Brandon Friedman
Sun Dec 30, 2007 at 11:58:06 PM PST

Having blown the whole "War on Terror" years ago, the supposedly-strong-on-national-security Bush administration has now thrown up its hands and decided to give up on seriously prosecuting the war in Afghanistan. Rather than address the immediate and very real threat posed by the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Commander Guy has chosen instead to focus America’s limited military assets on internal gangland warfare in Iraq and on a vague and very distant threat from the nutjob in Iran.

On Thursday, Flight Suit’s top guy in Afghanistan, Ambassador William Wood, delivered the message of surrender to America:

The United States supports reconciliation talks with Taliban fighters who have no ties to al-Qaida and accept Afghanistan's constitution, the U.S. ambassador said Thursday.

William Wood said the U.S. is in favor of a "serious reconciliation program with those elements of the Taliban who are prepared to accept the constitution and the authority of the elected government" of President Hamid Karzai.

Let me be clear about one thing: ALL elements of the Taliban sympathize with and support al Qaeda. That’s their whole purpose. They are both Sunni extremist groups that share the same goal of enforcing medieval Islamic law on whomever they can.

So if I hear another word about how Republicans are "strong on security," I’m going to ralph on my keyboard. To illustrate what I’m talking about, let’s take a trip in the ol’ wayback machine to September 15, 2001. That’s when the tough-talking, cheerleader-in-chief set the stage for future irony by telling us all:

We will find those who did it; we will smoke them out of their holes; we will get them running and we'll bring them to justice. We will not only deal with those who dare attack America, we will deal with those who harbor them and feed them and house them.

Make no mistake about it: underneath our tears is the strong determination of America to win this war. And we will win it.

I guess when he said that, his definition of "deal" meant to engage in half-hearted, indecisive military operations for six years, followed by a "serious reconciliation program."

The fact is, al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan (as opposed to the fake al Qaeda in Iraq), represents the gravest external threat to American national security today. This is because, after over six years, the people who brought you 9/11 are still being harbored by the Taliban in both of those countries. And the Taliban is making serious headway toward overthrowing the governments of both Afghanistan and Pakistan. And Pakistan has "nucular" weapons.

<...>

9/11 happened on their watch, and now they want to negotiate with the Taliban.

more


"The White House website home page does not even have a link to issues on Afghanistan or Pakistan."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. So Chief Chimpster is thrown'n in with the blackheads. Nice
It's way past time to impeach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. 25 police, soldiers killed in Afghanistan: officials

25 police, soldiers killed in Afghanistan: officials

Mon Dec 31, 4:38 AM ET

KABUL (AFP) - Twenty-five policemen and soldiers have been killed across insurgency-hit Afghanistan in fresh -- mainly Taliban-linked -- violence, authorities said.

Sixteen policemen were killed when their post in the southern province of Kandahar -- a hotbed of Taliban activities -- was attacked by Islamic rebels on Saturday, the interior ministry said.

Two other police officers were killed Monday in a roadside bomb blast in Musa Qala -- a town in southern Helmand province -- which was captured from the Taliban by Afghan and NATO forces this month, a district chief said.

Taliban militants claimed credit for the latest blast.

Similar bomb attacks killed five Afghan soldiers -- one of them in eastern Paktia on Monday and four others in southern Uruzgan a day earlier, the defence ministry said in a statement.

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. I hope the people who thought he would be tougher on terrorists are sorry
Here's a link to the OP's excellent post on John Kerry's recent speech on Afghanistan. (The sanity of what he recommends is refreshing after the distaste of where Bush is heading.)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=2409917
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC