Did John Kerry Win the 2004 Election?

[kster]

(AN OLDIE)...

Or are the Republican better at cheating?

Thousands of angry Democrats are posting evidence on the Internet that John Kerry won the 2004 presidential election, and that the Republicans altered the votes. These Democrats show that if the votes had been counted correctly, John Kerry would be the next US president.

Unfortunately, accurately counting the votes would not necessarily give the presidency to John Kerry. The reason is that if we were to accurately count the votes in the Iowa caucus we might find that Howard Dean beat John Kerry by an enormous margin.

All of the polls prior to the Iowa caucus showed Howard Dean far ahead of all other Democratic candidates. When John Kerry beat Howard Dean, the Democrats assumed that most of Dean supporters decided to switch to Kerry at the last moment, and for reasons nobody has been able to explain.

However, Kerry may have won because some group cheated. In which case, he cannot complain that Bush cheated him in the presidential election.

The absurdity of this situation might become more apparent if the Three Stooges and Laurel and Hardy were to join forces to produce a spoof on this. So, HugeQuestions.com presents for your entertainment:


The Three Stooges and Laurel and Hardy in
Voting; American Style


http://www.hugequestions.com/American_Voters.html

[MrSlayer]

1. Being that he is not currently residing in the White House.

I'd have to say no. Cheated or not he did not win.

[bluestateguy]

2. The 2004 election? That is so 2005

nt

[Richard Steele]

3. Yes. Ohio 2004 is the most BLATANT example of a stolen election in modern history.

Kerry won, and he won COMFORTABLY.

Even against Diebold and massive Repub "voter supression",
he won so big that B*shcabal™ was caught off-guard, and had
to scramble DESPERATELY to hide the numbers on election night.

They tossed the real numbers out, and just made shit up in desperation.
It's well documented.