AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 09:08 PM
Original message |
| Once again the winner of the debate was-- |
|
the democrats. The gop has nothing, literally.
|
monmouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Right on and Thank You for managing this task. Great job.. |
JohnnyLib2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. You're right ---- we win! |
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 09:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Agreed. Huge night for our side. |
|
What a frightening, repellent group of people the GOP is tossing at the electorate this time.
|
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 09:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Mmmm... Huckabee is VERY, VERY dangerous. |
earthlover
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. Huckabee would defeat Hillary handily |
|
Obama would be the best to oppose him in my view, would neutralize his manner.
|
pamela
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
He scares the shit out of me. I think he'd be the hardest to beat.
|
progressoid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 10. and his support is growing. |
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 11. A minister who became Governor??? |
|
And supports things like covenant marriages - and now wants to be President?? He is no threat at all.
|
book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 15. famous last words. I agree with the others he's the Republican to watch |
|
and could be potentially dangerous. He would unite the evangelic voters and still comes off as sane enough to attract moderate republicans.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 16. They're just desperate |
|
Horrified at what they've got to choose from and looking for anybdy to believe in. When they take a closer look at Huckabee, they'll be horrified by him too. He'll never get any press either. It's not 1976, he's not going to be able to pull off a Jimmy Carter.
|
Ikonoklast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Let's see, Mitt fumbles and stumbles, shoots own foot. |
|
Rudy rambles around but gets no traction. 911 ain't helpin' him with his baggage problem. Good 'Ol Fred is still breathing, so for him it's a 'win'. Ron Paul made a few hits, and just as many misses. Still loony. McCain was useful in squashing Mitt, but gains nothing. Tancredo needs to go home. Now. Huckabee is the big winner, but still far behind. Still a fundie nut.
|
NanceGreggs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-28-07 10:24 PM by NanceGreggs
As eloquent as it is precise.
On edit: Ooops! Forgot to add a K & R for the OP!
|
troubleinwinter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message |
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 09:40 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. I think the Dems are better, but watch out for Huckabee |
screembloodymurder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. I wouldn't underestimate the opposition. |
|
Remember 48% of Americans think we're winning in Iraq.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-28-07 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 13. always run like your 10 points behind. I never underestimate the other side |
|
but clearly the Democrats won tonight. Republicans offer fuck-o, nothing, no substance on any issues and even with a fascist friendly crowd tonight it still showed they have nothing.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 22nd 2013, 07:01 AM
Response to Original message |