Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lanny Davis is smacking Little Fucker upside the head.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:05 PM
Original message
Lanny Davis is smacking Little Fucker upside the head.
This is a riot! Tune in to MSNBC...whether or not you believe Bill Clinton, Davis is doing a great job telling Carlson that he is full of crap and lying through his teeth.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like Lanny but he is wrong on this and he knows it Bill supported Bush going to war PERIOD!!!
Edited on Wed Nov-28-07 05:10 PM by bigdarryl
I guest when it comes to the Clinton's it depends on what the word SUPPORT means JESUS!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. At best, Bubba was the MOST SILENT opposition the Iraq War ever had.
Edited on Wed Nov-28-07 05:27 PM by TahitiNut
When the 10% of us who were Correct to Oppose the Criminal Invaion of Iraq were marching in the streets, Bubba and Hill were cozied up to the likes of Lieberman in anticipation of Smirk's Crusade.

Eighty percent of the people in this country were on a Kool-Aid diet, swallowing everything the Cheney/Bush cabal could pour into their glasses while we were in a very small minority looking and almost BEGGING for ANY politician with stature to stand up and speak out. There was Kucinich in the House and Feingold in the Senate - and Bill and Hill treated them both like LEPERS!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Please post a link...I have googled and can't find it anywhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Try finding ANY cite that he opposed it.
:shrug: Silence is consent!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. You are wrong. And you probably suffer from CDS.
It isn't what the word "support" means; it's what was the thing he said he supported.

Hint: it was NOT Bush's war. Read the quotes carefully (and honestly) and you can see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think so
Davis looked like an idiot supporting this bullshit about the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree with both of you...Lanny is wrong to support Clinton
I just think it is fun watching him tell Tucker to STFU.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Whenever I see Lanny I think of all of his support of Lieberman and attacking
Democrats during the Connecticut Senate race. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can't stand Lanny's voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. You should hear him play the piano! LOL
He's a lawyer, for Pete's sake, What do you expect his voice to sound like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. You know something, it is really showing how the Clinton haters twist
things. Bill Clinton's statement on the war....he said he supported President BUSH going after weapons of mass destruction.

HE DID NOT IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM SAY THAT BUSH SHOULD HAVE STARTED A WAR IN IRAQ AND THAT HE SUPPORTED THAT WAR......................................... FIND IT...AND POST IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Are you talkin' to me? Are you talkin' to ME?
I'm no "Clinton Hater." I like Bill. I'm a bit disappointed in some of his antics lately, but not enough to be say I even dislike him or anything. I think he was one of the best presidents America's had in decades, not just because of his governance, but also because of what he did for America's stature abroad. I'm not happy with NAFTA, but no president bats 1000.

Now, Hillary Clinton, otoh...I'll vote for her if she is the Democratic party nominee. But that is the best thing I can say about her. Still, I in no way "hate" her.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. If bank robbers faced such "opposition" all the banks would be empty.
Before the invasion, Mr. Clinton did not precisely declare that he opposed the war. A week before military action began, however, he did say that he preferred to give weapons inspections more time and that an invasion was not necessary to topple Saddam Hussein.

At the same time, he also spoke supportively about the 2002 Senate resolution that authorized military action against Iraq.

Advisers to Mr. Clinton said yesterday that he did oppose the war, but that it would have been inappropriate at the time for him, a former president, to oppose in a direct, full-throated manner the sitting presidents military decision.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/28/us/politics/28clinton...


Too little. Too late. That's not 'leadership' nor even principled ... that's political revisionism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. The only thing Bill supported doing in a direct, full-throated manner was
Edited on Wed Nov-28-07 06:36 PM by wtmusic
ah, nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Bullshit weasel words.
At the same time, he also spoke supportively about the 2002 Senate resolution that authorized military action against Iraqwe


Talk about weasel words! The times couldn't be bothered to post what he actually said...just that he "spoke supportively" about the resolution. If it was so supportive as to be worth so much ink, why couldn't they cite his actual "supportive" words?

Come on...we're smarter than that. Hasn't seven years of this shit taught you how to read republican propaganda?

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. ...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 18th 2014, 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC