Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi Turns to Confront Bush on War Spending

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 06:47 PM
Original message
Pelosi Turns to Confront Bush on War Spending
Pelosi Turns to Confront Bush on War Spending
By Jason Leopold, Maya Schenwar and Matt Renner
t r u t h o u t | Report

Friday 09 November 2007

A year after Democrats took control of both houses of Congress, due in large part to the public's frustration with the occupation of Iraq, Democratic Speaker Nancy Pelosi unveiled a new plan Thursday that ties additional war funding to the withdrawal of US troops from the region.

The so-called "A New Direction in Iraq" is an ambitious piece of legislation that would provide the Pentagon with $50 billion in short-term funding to continue operations in Iraq through early March, and set a "goal" of December 2008 for pulling soldiers out of the country.

The White House said Thursday evening President Bush would swiftly veto the bill if it reaches his desk. Pelosi fired back, telling some reporters following a meeting with Democrats Thursday afternoon that if Bush balks at the proposal she and her Democratic colleagues will not consider any Iraq funding for the rest of the year.

Republicans said if that were to happen the Pentagon would be out of cash to pay for Iraq operations by as early as January, a time frame that the Congressional Research Service, the nonpartisan investigative arm of Congress, has disputed.

Additionally, should specifically allocated war funds expire, Congress could use money from the general defense budget, since the language of the budget does not bar it from being channeled into operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Earlier this year, Democrats hammered out legislation tied to a $99.4 billion emergency-spending bill for Iraq that placed specific benchmarks on withdrawing and redeploying troops. Bush vetoed the legislation. In July, Democrats surrendered to White House demands, and criticism by Republicans who mocked their counterparts for their "cut-and-run" strategy. Democrats relented on the issue saying they did not have enough support to override a presidential veto and helped pass the emergency funds removing earlier restrictions they put in place. The move resulted in a widespread backlash against the lawmakers that helped sink their approval ratings.

Still, Pelosi said Democrats would not hand the White House another "blank check," at a news conference Thursday. "This is providing funding for the troops limited to a particular purpose, for a short time frame."

more...

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/110907A.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can't help it ...
But the words "paper tiger in a thousand dollar pants suit" are the only ones that come to mind. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. That might have been a good first step during Pelosi's first 100 hours
now a year later, it smacks of too little too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-09-07 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why do I smell the faint odor of "Eau de Cave" here??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC